Gauhati High Court
AB/732/2026 of NUR ALOM SK Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 17 August 2026
GAHC010068372026 2026:GAU-AS:11794 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/732/2026 NUR ALOM SK S/O LALCHAND ALIAS LALCHAN SK, R/O VILL 1 HARAPUTA, PS GOSSAIGAON, DIST KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR TO BE REPRESENTED
GAHC010068372026
2026:GAU-AS:11794
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/732/2026
NUR ALOM SK
S/O LALCHAND ALIAS LALCHAN SK, R/O VILL 1 HARAPUTA, PS
GOSSAIGAON, DIST KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
2:ROUSHANARA BIBI
W/O ABDUL KARIM SK
R/O VILL BHOMRABIL NO 2
PS GOSSAIGAON
DIST KOKRAJHAR
ASSAM
PIN 78336
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SARFRAZ NAWAZ, A MISHRA,MD A RAHMAN,MS
SURAYA RAHMAN,MR A W AMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR SAIFUL ISLAM(R2)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.08.2026
Heard Mr. A. Rahman, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
2. Apprehending arrest in connection with Gossaigaon PS Case No. 48/2026, under Section 64(1) of the BNS, read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act, this application under Section 482 of the BNSS, is preferred by applicant namely, Nur Alom Sk., for grant of pre-arrest bail.
3. It is to be noted here that the above noted case has been registered on the basis of one FIR lodged by one Monuwara Begum (actual name withheld) on 08.03.2026.
3.1. The essence of allegation made in the FIR is that the applicant had a close relationship with the daughter of the informant, aged about 16 years and on the promise to marry her, he established physical relation with her on several occasions.
4. Mr. Rahman, learned counsel for the applicant, submits that this Court, vide order dated 06.05.2026, had granted interim protection to the applicant and pursuant to the said order, he had appeared before the IO and he has been cooperating with the investigating agency and that his statement has also been recorded. On such count, Mr. Rahman has contended to make the interim order dated 06.05.2026, absolute in the same terms and conditions.
5. On the other hand, Mr. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, submits that though the case diary was called for, vide order dated 06.05.2026, he has not received the same. But, as per his instruction, the IO has completed investigation and submitted charge-sheet in this case, being Charge-Sheet No. 70/2026, dated 29.05.2026.
6. Taking note of the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties, this Court is inclined to dispose of this application by directing the applicant to appear before the learned trial court, within a period of two weeks from today and to apply for regular bail.
7. In the event of filing such an application, the learned trial court shall consider the same in accordance with law.
8. Till then, the interim order, dated 06.05.2026, shall continue.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant