Gauhati High Court
AB/515/2026 of ASHIQUE UDDIN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 17 August 2026
GAHC010036762026 2026:GAU-AS:11793 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/515/2026 ASHIQUE UDDIN S/O ALA UDDIN RESIDENT OF CHANDANPUR, P.S - DOBOKA, DIST- HOJAI, ASSAM, PIN- 782445 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE P. P
GAHC010036762026
2026:GAU-AS:11793
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/515/2026
ASHIQUE UDDIN
S/O ALA UDDIN
RESIDENT OF CHANDANPUR, P.S - DOBOKA, DIST- HOJAI, ASSAM, PIN- 782445
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE P. P ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : F K R AHMED, M U BARBHUYAN,MRS. H THAKURIA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.08.2026 Heard Mr. F. K. R. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. P. Barthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
2. This application, under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, is preferred by the applicant, namely, Ashique Uddin, who has been apprehending arrest in connection with Doboka P.S. Case No. 198/2025, registered under Sections 299/196 of the of BNS, 2023, read with Sections 5(1)/7/13 of the Cattle Preservation Act, 2011.
3. It is to be noted here that the aforementioned case has been registered on the basis of one FIR lodged by one S.I. Paresh Das, Doboka Police Station, on 10.10.2025. The essence of allegation against the present applicant, in the FIR dated 10.10.2025, is that he is found to be involved in slaughtering of cattle, at the backside of his house, situated at Chandanpur village; and also involved in illegal selling and transportation of cow meat (beef), and approximately 40 kg of suspected raw cow meat (beef) was recovered in an abandoned condition, at the backside of his house.
4. Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant, submits that the applicant was granted the privilege of interim pre-arrest bail, vide order dated 24.03.2026, and accordingly, the applicant had appeared before the I.O., and that he has been cooperating with the investigation agency and therefore, he has contended to make the interim order, dated 24.03.2026, absolute, in the same terms and conditions.
5. Per contra, Mr. Barthakur, learned APP for the State respondent, submits that though he was directed to produce the case diary before this Court, yet, he has not received the same. And as per his instruction, after completion of investigation, the I.O. has submitted charge-sheet, being charge-sheet No. 36/2026, dated 28.04.2026, before the learned Trial Court.
6. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for both the parties and also in view of submission of charge-sheet by the I.O. against the present applicant, after completion of the investigation, this Court is inclined to dispose of this application, by directing the applicant to appear before the learned Trial Court on or before 10.09.2026, and to apply for regular bail. And in the event of filing such an application, the learned Trial Court shall consider the same in accordance with law.
7. Till then, the interim order dated 24.03.2026, stands extended.
8. In terms of the above, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant