Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./1825/2026 of MD MATIUR RAHMAN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 16 August 2026
GAHC010137022026 2026:GAU-AS:11652 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1825/2026 MD MATIUR RAHMAN S/O LATE ABDUL KUDDUS R/O PACHIM BORAGAON P.S. GORCHUK DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM
GAHC010137022026
2026:GAU-AS:11652
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./1825/2026
MD MATIUR RAHMAN
S/O LATE ABDUL KUDDUS
R/O PACHIM BORAGAON
P.S. GORCHUK
DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M H AHMED, I AMIN,R ALI
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
17.08.2026
Heard Mr. M.H. Ahmed, learned counsel for the accused and Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This application, under Section 483 of the BNSS, is preferred by accused, namely Md. Matiur Rahman, who has been languishing in jail hazot, in connection with the Gorchuk PS Case No. 117/2026, under Section 13(1) of the Assam Cattle Preservation Act, for granting bail.
3. The aforementioned case has been registered on the basis of one FIR lodged by SI Rahul Baruah of Gorchuk Police Station, on 29.05.2026.
3.1. The essence of allegation made in the FIR is that acting on a tip-off, the police personnel of Gorchuk Police Station conducted a raid in the house of one Md. Maynul Hoque, located at Pochim Boragaon. During search, some persons were found involve in slaughtering of cattle and recovered some articles including slaughtered cattle head and meat from the place of occurrence and thereafter, seized the same in presence of witnesses.
4. Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel for the accused, submits that this Court, vide order dated 30.06.2026, had granted interim bail to the present accused and pursuant to the said order, he has appeared before the IO and his statement has been recorded and therefore, Mr. Ahmed has contended to make the interim order dated 30.06.2026, absolute in the same terms and conditions.
5. Per-contra, Mr. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, submits that he has not received the case diary. But, as per his instructions, the IO has submitted charge-sheet before the learned trial court, being Charge-Sheet No. 142/2026, dated 28.06.2026.
6. In view of the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties, this Court is inclined to dispose of this application by directing the accused to appear before the learned trial court on or before 16.09.2026 and to apply for regular bail and in event of filing such an application, the learned Court below shall consider the same in accordance with law.
7. Till then, the interim order, dated 30.06.2026, stands extended.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant