Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2467/2026 of DHANJIT RAJBONGSHI Vs SHRI JAYANT NARLIKAR on 16 August 2026
GAHC010144382025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No.: I.A.(Civil)/2467/2026 DHANJIT RAJBONGSHI SON OF SRI MAHENDRA RAJBONGSHI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SRIPURDEOR P.O.-ODALBARI P.S.- MUSHALPUR DISTRICT-BAKSA ASSAM PIN- 781372.
GAHC010144382025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No.: I.A.(Civil)/2467/2026
DHANJIT RAJBONGSHI
SON OF SRI MAHENDRA RAJBONGSHI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SRIPURDEOR
P.O.-ODALBARI
P.S.- MUSHALPUR
DISTRICT-BAKSA
ASSAM
PIN- 781372.
VERSUS
SHRI JAYANT NARLIKAR
COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06.
2:SHRI GAUTAM DAS
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BAKSA MUSHALPUR
PIN-781372
3:SHRI JITU KR BARMAN
THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM NAZARAT BRANCH
BAKSA
MUSHALPUR-781372
4:KIMNEI CHANGSAN
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BAKSA MUSHALPUR
PIN-781372.
5:ARUP KUMAR CHOUDHURY
THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM NAZARAT BRANCH
BAKSA
MUSHALPUR-781372.
For the Applicant (s) : Ms. D. Borah, Advocate For the Respondent (s) : XXXX
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
17.08.2026
This is an application for impleadment of the parties, namely, (i) Kimnei Changsan, the District Commissioner, Baksa, Mushalpur, PIN- 781372; and (ii) Arup Kumar Choudhury, the Additional District Commissioner-cum-Nazarat Branch, Baksa, Mushalpur, PIN-781372, as Contemnors/Respondent Nos.4 & 5 respectively in the accompanying contempt proceedings.
2. Taking into account the grounds taken at Paragraph Nos.2 and 3 of the application, it is the opinion of this Court that the Contemnor/Respondent Nos.4 & 5 are necessary parties for an effective adjudication of the accompanying contempt petition.
3. Accordingly, the Opposite Party Nos.4 & 5 are impleaded as Contemnor/Respondent Nos.4 & 5 in the accompanying contempt proceedings.
4. The learned counsel for the Petitioner is directed to file a fresh Memo of Parties before the Registry of this Court within 7 (seven) days from today. The Registry, on the basis of the instant order as well as the fresh Memo of Parties, shall make the necessary corrections in the cause title of the accompanying contempt proceedings and update the same in the CIS.
5. Accordingly, the I.A. stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant