Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/2398/2026 of DR KANGKAN PATHAK Vs THE UNION OF INDIA on 16 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010088802026 2026:GAU-AS:11687 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2398/2026 DR KANGKAN PATHAK SON OF LATE BISWAMBHAR PATHAK, RESIDENT OF KALIBARI TINIALI, NEAR OLD BAN STAGE, TEZPUR, SONITPUR-784001, ASSAM. VERSUS THE UNION

GAHC010088802026

2026:GAU-AS:11687

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/2398/2026

DR KANGKAN PATHAK

SON OF LATE BISWAMBHAR PATHAK, RESIDENT OF KALIBARI TINIALI, NEAR OLD BAN STAGE, TEZPUR, SONITPUR-784001, ASSAM.

VERSUS

THE UNION OF INDIA

, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY

WELFARE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NIRMAN BHAWAN, NEW

DELHL110011.

2:THE SECRETARY

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA CUM CHAIRMAN

EXECUTIVE COUNCIL

LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL

HEALTH

TEZPUR

NIRMAN BHAWAN

NEW DELHI-110011.

3:THE DIRECTOR

LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL

HEALTH

TEZPUR

DISTRICT SONITPUR

PIN784001

ASSAM.

4:THE OSD

DEPUTY DIRECTOR

LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL

HEALTH

TEZPUR

DISTRICT SONITPUR

PIN784001 ASSAM.

5:THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER (I/C)

LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL

HEALTH

TEZPUR

DISTRICT SONITPUR

PIN784001

ASSAM.

6:DR JYOTI HAZARIKA

LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL

HEALTH

QRT E5/TYPE VI

LGBRIMH CAMPUS

TEZPUR

DISTRICT SONITPUR

PIN 784001 ASSAM.

7:DR HEMANTA DUTTA

LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL

HEALTH

QRT 19/TYPE VI

LGBRIMH CAMPUS

TEZPUR

DISTRICT SONITPUR

PIN-784001

ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR BHARGAV DAS, MS T WAPANGLA,MS. SANSKRITI

BARUA,MR. C PAUL,MR. K P PATHAK,MR. M SARMA

Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 17-08-2026

Mr. B Das, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.

Considering the submission, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead