Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2600/2026 of MS BHARTIA INFRA PROJECTS LIMITED, Vs SRI BABUL NATH on 16 August 2026
GAHC010043992026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2600/2026 in WP(C)/1268/2026 MS BHARTIA INFRA PROJECTS LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 201 ROYAL ARCADE 2ND FLOOR DR. B.
GAHC010043992026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2600/2026
in
WP(C)/1268/2026
MS BHARTIA INFRA PROJECTS LIMITED
A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 201
ROYAL ARCADE
2ND FLOOR
DR. B. BARUAH ROAD
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI 781007
ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY SHRI AVINASH BHARTIA
SON OF SRI PAWAN BHARTIA
VERSUS
SRI BABUL NATH
SON OF SRI MONORANJAN NATH
R/O EX-POLICE LINE
TEZPUR
P.O. P.S. TEZPUR
DISTRICT SONITPUR
ASSAM
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
FOREST DEPARTMENT
GUWAHATI 781006.
3:THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
FOREST DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI 781006
4:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND HEAD OF FOREST
FORCE
ASSAM
ARANYA BHAWAN
PANJABARI
GUWAHATI 781037
5:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST T
LOWER ASSAM ZONE
BASISHTHA
GUWAHATI 781029.
6:THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND NODAL OFFICER FOREST
CONSERVATION ACT
ASSAM
ARANYA BHAWAN
PANJABARI
GUWAHATI 781027.
7:THE CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS
LOWER ASSAM S.F. CIRCLE
BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
8:THE DEPUTY SECRETARY
MINES AND MINERALS DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI 781006.
9:THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
DHUBRI FOREST DIVISION
DHUBRI
ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : MR K L GUPTA
Advocate for : SC
FOREST appearing for SRI BABUL NATH
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
17.08.2026 Heard Shri KL Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant, who by means of this application has prayed for impleadment as the respondent no. 9 in the connected writ petition being WP(C)/1268/2026.
2. Also heard Shri BD Deka, learned counsel for the opposite party / writ petitioner.
3. The challenge in the writ petition is connected to an e-auction notice dated 12.02.2026. The applicant has submitted that it has participated in the said tender process and are vitally interested in the adjudication of the present writ petition.
4. On the other hand, Shri Deka, learned counsel for the opposite party / writ petitioner has submitted that the applicant may not have any say in the adjudication process which is against the decision making process.
5. Be that as it may, this Court is of the view that the outcome of the writ petition may have impact on the rights of the applicant and therefore, is entitled to have an opportunity in the decision making process of this Court in the connected writ petition.
6. In view of the above, the I.A. stands allowed and the applicant named below, be impleaded as the respondent no. 9 in the connected writ petition: “M/s Bhartia Infra Projects Limited A company incorporated under the Companies Act, having its office at 201, Royal Arcade, 2nd Floor, Dr. B. Baruah Road, Ulubari, Guwahati 781 007, Assam represented by its Authorised Signatory, Shri Avinash Bhartia Son of Sri Pawan Bhartia.”
7. The I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant