Gauhati High Court

Crl.Pet./1521/2019 of BETTERFUL LANONG AND ANR. Vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ANR on 16 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010319672019 2026:GAU-AS:11637 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./1521/2019 BETTERFUL LANONG AND ANR. S/O-LATE KATSAH KHONGLAH, PERMANENT R/O- VILL- SOHKHA, P.O- DAWKI, JAINTIA HILLS DISTRICT, MEGHALAYA- 793109, PRESENTLY

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010319672019

2026:GAU-AS:11637

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Crl.Pet./1521/2019

BETTERFUL LANONG AND ANR.

S/O-LATE KATSAH KHONGLAH, PERMANENT R/O- VILL- SOHKHA, P.O- DAWKI, JAINTIA HILLS DISTRICT, MEGHALAYA- 793109, PRESENTLY R/O- AND WORKING AS GM AT JAWAHARLAL NEHRU INSTITUTE OF BANKING

AND FINANCE, APEX TRAINING INSTITUTE OF IDBI BANK LTD, GACHIBOWLI, HYDERBAD, TELANGANA- 500032

2: BIDISHA SAIKIA

W/O- SRI ANUPAL BURAGOHAIN

PERMANENT R/O- BYE LANE NO.5

SEUJPUR

DIBRUGARH- 786001 AND PRESENT R/O- HILOIDHARI GAON

NH 61

AMGURI 785680

DIST- SIVASAGAR

ASSA

VERSUS

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ANR

ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING, GROUOND FLOOR, F WING, CGO COMPLEX, DF BLOCK, SECTOR-1, SALT LAKE CITY, KOLKATA- 700064, WEST

BENGAL

2:TRIPTIMOY BANDHOPADHYAY

S/O- LATE SUDHIR KUMAR BANDHOPADHYAY

DEPUTY GM

IDBI

HOUSE NO. 44 SHAKESPEARE SARANI P.O

KOLKATA- 700017

WEST BENGA

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R DUBEY, MS. A B KAYASTHA,MR. A N I HUSSAIN

Page No.# 2/2

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, C B I, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

17.08.2026 Heard Mr. R. Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. M. Kumari, learned Standing Counsel, CBI.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has submitted that he is under instructions not to press the present criminal petition. Accordingly, this criminal petition is closed on withdrawal.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners would appear before the learned trial court and shall avail such remedies as may be permissible in law.

4. The interim order passed earlier in this case shall stand merged with the closure of the criminal petition. JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead