Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2263/2026 of SMTI JANAKI KOCH, Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM, on 16 August 2026
GAHC010095782026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) I.A.(Civil)/2263/2026 SMTI JANAKI KOCH WIFE OF LATEDHANESWAR KOCH RESIDENT OFVILLAGE SAUKUCHI P.O.SAUKUCHI P.S. GARCHUK DISTRICT KAMRUPMETRO ASSAM PIN NO.781040 VERSUS THE STATE OF
GAHC010095782026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
I.A.(Civil)/2263/2026
SMTI JANAKI KOCH
WIFE OF LATEDHANESWAR KOCH
RESIDENT OFVILLAGE SAUKUCHI
P.O.SAUKUCHI
P.S. GARCHUK
DISTRICT KAMRUPMETRO ASSAM
PIN NO.781040
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TOTHE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI -781006.
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICCOMMISSIONER DISTRICT KAMRUPM
LICHUBAGAN
HENGRABARI
GUWAHATI
ASSAM 781036.
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
DISPURREVENUE CIRCLE
BELTOLA
BASISTHA
GUWAHATI
KAMRUPMETRO
ASSAM
PIN NO.781028.
4:THE SHERISTADAR
COURT OF THECIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISIONNO.1
KAMRUP METRO
GUWATI
ASSAM.
------------
Advocate for : MR SAIFUL ISLAM
Advocate for : SC
REVENUE appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
17.08.2026
Heard Mr. D. Barman, learned counsel for the applicant; Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue and Disaster Management Department for the opposite party no. 1; and Mr. S.S. Roy, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the opposite party nos. 2 & 3.
2. The applicant as the writ petitioner preferred the accompanying writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 2839/2026. In the writ petition, the petitioner has inter alia sought for a direction to the respondent authorities to decide the composite land sale transfer application filed by the petitioner.
3. In this interlocutory application, it is averred that for the purpose of deciding the accompanying writ petition, presence of the following authority, that is, ‘Sheristadar, Court of Civil Judge [Senior Division] No. 1, Kamrup [Metro], Guwahati’ as party-respondent no. 4 is necessary.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have submitted that they have no objection if the interlocutory application seeking impleadment of the proposed authority as s party-respondent in the accompanying writ petition is allowed.
5. Having gone through the statements and averments made in the instant application, I am of the considered view that the presence of the afore-mentioned authority as the party- respondent no. 4 in the accompanying writ petition appears necessary for adjudication of the issues involved therein.
6. Consequently, the instant interlocutory application seeking impleadment of the party- respondent no. 4 in the accompanying writ petition stands allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant