Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4136/2026 of MOJJAMEL HOQUE BHUYAN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS on 16 August 2026
GAHC010160412026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4136/2026 MOJJAMEL HOQUE BHUYAN S/O. INNACH ALI BHUYAN, R/O. VILLAGE PIRADHARA PT-I, P.O. PIRADHARA, P.S. ABHAYAPURI, DISTRICT BONGAIGAON, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010160412026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4136/2026
MOJJAMEL HOQUE BHUYAN
S/O. INNACH ALI BHUYAN, R/O. VILLAGE PIRADHARA PT-I, P.O.
PIRADHARA, P.S. ABHAYAPURI, DISTRICT BONGAIGAON, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENVIRONMENT AND
FOREST DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-
781006.
2:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS AND HEAD OF
FOREST FORCE
ASSAM
PANJABARI
GUWAHATI-781037
3:TEJAS MARISWAMY
DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
GOALPARA DIVISION (T)
DISTRICT GOALPARA
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR F HAQUE, MR A ISLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FOREST,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
17.08.2026
Heard Mr. F. Haque, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R.R. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, Forest Department for the respondent nos. 1 & 2. In the course of their submissions, the learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the vehicle bearing Registration no. AS-19/AC-3968 has been released, in the meantime, in terms of the Order dated 01.07.2026 passed by the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Goalpara. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that in view of the same, the subject-matter of the writ petition has become infructuous and, therefore, the writ petition can be closed. Mr. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, Forest Department has submitted that the release of the vehicle shall not be construed as a bar for the respondent authorities in the Forest Department to initiate any action as permissible under the law as regards the said vehicle. In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant