Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2577/2019 of PALLOB MAHANTA Vs BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. AND 6 ORS on 13 August 2026
GAHC010082862019 2026:GAU-AS:11576 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2577/2019 PALLOB MAHANTA S/O- SRI JITEN MAHANTA, R/O- H NO. 36, RANGALI PATHAR, NAHARKATIA, DIST- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, PIN- 786610 VERSUS BHARAT PETROLEUM
GAHC010082862019
2026:GAU-AS:11576
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2577/2019
PALLOB MAHANTA
S/O- SRI JITEN MAHANTA, R/O- H NO. 36, RANGALI PATHAR, NAHARKATIA, DIST- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, PIN- 786610
VERSUS
BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. AND 6 ORS
A GOVT OF INDIA ENTERPRISE REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, BHARAT
BHAWAN, 4 AND 6 CURRIMBHOY ROAD, BALLARD ESTATE, MUMBAI- 400001
2:THE TERRITORY MANAGER (RETAIL)
BPCL
NEXIA PARK
1ST FLOOR
GMCH ROAD
CHRISTIAN BASTI
GUWAHATI- 781005
3:THE SECRETARY
TO THE GOVT OF INDIA
MIN OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAY
1 SANSAD MARG
GOKUL NAGAR
CONNAUGHT PLACE
NEW DELHI- 110001
4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
DIBRUGARH
MANCOTTA ROAD
RAILWAY COLONY
ASSAM
PIN- 786003
5:UTPAL BARUAH
C/O- G H FILLING STATION
BHARAT PETROLEUM
JOYPUR
DIBRUGARH- 786610
6:THE INDIAN ROAD CONGRESS
REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT
IRC BHAWAN
KAMA KOTI MARG
SECTOR- 6
RK PURAM
NEW DELHI- 110022
7:ESSAR OIL LIMITED
131 MRD ROAD
BESIDES
ASSAM TRIBUNE
SUB POST OFFICE
SILPUKHURI
GUWAHATI- 781003
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P MAHANTA, MR. R B GOHAIN,MR. P K AGARWALA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. Y. DOLOI, CGC (R-3), MR. P J SAIKIA(R5),MS M
NIROLA(R5),MR. P BORDOLOI(R5),MR. S S ROY (R1, R2),MR. S BORTHAKUR (R1, R2),MS. S
KAKATI (R1, R2),MS. M. BHATTACHARJEE, ADDITIONAL SENIOR GA (R-4)
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
14.08.2026.
Mr. M. Sarma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. P. Mahanta, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter in the meantime has become infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands closed on being infructuous. Interim order, passed earlier accordingly stands vacated. Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2, Ms. M. Nirola, learned counsel for the respondent No.5 and Mr. R. Talukdar, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the respondent No.4 are present.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant