Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2517/2026 of RAKESH BISWAS Vs RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, RBI on 13 August 2026
GAHC010154302026 2026:GAU-AS:11580 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2517/2026 RAKESH BISWAS RO HAVILDAR, B BLOCK 136. NEAR 222 ABOD UNIT, SATGAON, SONAPUR SUB DISTRICT, KAMRUP M, 781027, PERMANENT RO AMBARPUR, NORTH 24
GAHC010154302026
2026:GAU-AS:11580
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2517/2026
RAKESH BISWAS
RO HAVILDAR, B BLOCK 136. NEAR 222 ABOD UNIT, SATGAON, SONAPUR
SUB DISTRICT, KAMRUP M, 781027, PERMANENT RO AMBARPUR, NORTH
24 PARGANAS, MURIGHATA, WEST BENGAL 743251
VERSUS
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, RBI
11TH 22ND FLOOR, CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDING, SHAHID BHAGAT SINGH
ROAD, FORT, MUMBAI 400001, INDIA
2:THE OMBUDSMAN
RBI CENTRALISED RECEIPT AND PROCESSING CENTRE CRPC
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
4TH FLOOR
SECTOR 17
CHANDIGARH 160017
INDIA
3:SBI CARDS AND PAYMENT SERVICES LTD
DLF INFINITY TOWERS
TOWER C
12TH FLOOR
BLOCK 2
BUILDING 3
DLF CYBER CITY
GURGAON 122002
HARYANA
INDIA
4:ICICI BANK LIMITED
ICICI BANK TOWER
NEAR CHAKLI CIRCLE
OLD PADRA ROAD
VADODARA 390 007
GUJARAT
INDI
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. S NEWAR, Advocate for the Respondent : MR. B P BORAH, MR. P HAZARIKA
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
14.08.2026.
Heard Ms. U. Duwara, learned counsel appearing for the applicant/petitioner. Also heard Mr. P.J. Dutta, learned counsel appearing in behalf of Mr. B.P. Bora, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3, Mr. P. Hazarika, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1 & 2 and Mr. M. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.4. It appears that on the last occasion i.e. 10.08.2026, upon Mr. B.P. Bora, learned counsel for the respondent No.3 submitting that unintentionally there was a deduction, however the same has been resorted back into the account of the petitioners, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner who was accommodate to obtain instructions from the applicant as whether the unintentional deduction has been resorted back to the account of the petitioner or not, today when the matter is called, Ms. U. Duwara, learned counsel submits that the said deduction has already restored back in the account of the writ petitioner.
Accordingly, nothing survives for adjudication of the instant interlocutory application, the same is closed as being infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant