Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2092/2026 of SHRI MONIRAM DAS, Vs THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD on 13 August 2026
GAHC010102032026 2026:GAU-AS:11495 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2092/2026 SHRI MONIRAM DAS, S/O JAYRAM DAS AND HUSBAND OF LATE RUNU DAS, RESIDENT OF GARPANDU KUMARPARA, PO AND PS JALUKBARI, GUWAHATI DIST KAMRUP (M)
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010102032026
2026:GAU-AS:11495
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2092/2026
SHRI MONIRAM DAS,
S/O JAYRAM DAS AND HUSBAND OF LATE RUNU DAS, RESIDENT OF GARPANDU KUMARPARA, PO AND PS JALUKBARI, GUWAHATI DIST KAMRUP (M) ASSAM, 781012
2: SHRI RAJA DAS
S/O MONIRAM DAS
RESIDENT OF GARPANDU KUMARPARA
PO AND PS JALUKBARI
GUWAHATI DIST KAMRUP (M) ASSAM
781012
3: MS. RITUMONI DAS
S/O MONIRAM DAS
RESIDENT OF GARPANDU KUMARPARA
PO AND PS JALUKBARI
GUWAHATI DIST KAMRUP (M) ASSAM
78101
VERSUS
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
REGISTERED OFFICE AT ORIENTAL HOUSE, A25 27, ASAF ALI ROAD, NEW
DELHI 110002
2:THE CHIEF REGIONAL MANAGER AND DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
REGIONAL OFFICE
GS ROAD
ULUBARI
Page No.# 2/2
GUWAHATI 781007
3:THE GENERAL MANAGER (PERSONNEL)
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
ORIENTAL HOUSE
PB NO 7037
A 25 27
ASAF ALI ROAD
NEW DELHI
11000
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. T SOM, MR. U HAZARIKA,MS. A MAHANTA
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 14.08.2026
Heard Ms. T. Som, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Ms. K. Bora, learned counsel for the respondents. This is an application seeking substitution of the petitioner on account of the demise of the petitioner on 04.12.2025 in the connected WP(C)3562/2022. Having considered that the applicants are the legal heirs of late Runu Das, who had expired on 04.12.2025, leaving behind the present applicants and the prayer for substitution not being objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents, I deem it appropriate to allow this application. Accordingly, the applicants are allowed to be substituted the original writ petitioner in WP(C) 3562/2022. I.A. stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant