Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Crl.)/817/2026 of TOMESH BASUMATARY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. on 13 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010158722026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/817/2026 TOMESH BASUMATARY S/O. GELSING BASUMATARY R/O. VILL. AMLAIGURI P/S. PANBARI DIST. CHIRANG ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. TO BE REPRESENTED BY

GAHC010158722026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/817/2026

TOMESH BASUMATARY

S/O. GELSING BASUMATARY

R/O. VILL. AMLAIGURI

P/S. PANBARI

DIST. CHIRANG

ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.

TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

ASSAM

2:DR NILPADMINI RABHA

PRINCIPAL

U.N. BRAHMA COLLEGE

W/O. KHAGEN RABHA

R/O. VILL. KAJALGAON

P/S. KAJALGAON

DIST. CHIRANG

ASSAM

------------

Advocate for : MR SARFRAZ NAWAZ

Advocate for : PP

ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 14.08.2026

Heard Mr. S. Nawaz, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the opposite party No. 1.

2. This application, under Section 430(1) of the BNSS, 2023, is preferred by the applicant for suspension of the sentence and to allow him to remain on previous bail during the pendency of the connected appeal.

3. It is to be noted here that vide impugned judgment and order dated 08.07.2026, the learned Sessions Judge, Chirang (‘trial Court’, for short), in Sessions Case No. 21/2025, had convicted the applicant under Sections 319 and 61 of the BNS, 2023 and Section 10 (1) of Assam Public Examination (Measures for Prevention of Unfair Means in Recruitment) Act, 2024, and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 (three) years and to pay a fine Rs.10,000/-, with default stipulation for the offence under Section 319, BNS, 2023; to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 (three) years and to pay a fine Rs.10,000/-, with default stipulation for the offence under Section 61, BNS, 2023; and to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 (three) years and to pay a fine Rs.10,000/-, with default stipulation for the offence under Section 10 (1) of Assam Public Examination (Measures for Prevention of Unfair Means in Recruitment) Act, 2024; and directed to run all the sentences concurrently.

4. Taking note of the facts and circumstances on the record, the sentence so imposed by the learned trial Court, vide impugned judgment and order dated 08.07.2026, stands suspended till disposal of the connected appeal. Further, the applicant is allowed to remain on previous bail.

5. In terms of above, this I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead