Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/4317/2026 of MAJIBUR RAHMAN Vs THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 5 ORS on 13 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010163612026 2026:GAU-AS:11501-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4317/2026 MAJIBUR RAHMAN S/O LATE NAUSHAD ALI, VILLAGE- ATHKURIA, P.O.- PATHARIGHAT, DISTRICT- DARRANG, ASSAM-784144 VERSUS 1: THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010163612026

2026:GAU-AS:11501-DB

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4317/2026 MAJIBUR RAHMAN S/O LATE NAUSHAD ALI, VILLAGE- ATHKURIA, P.O.- PATHARIGHAT, DISTRICT- DARRANG, ASSAM-784144 VERSUS 1: THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. A BODY CORPORATE CONSTITUTED UNDER THE STATE BANK OF INDIA ACT, 1955, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, HAVING ITS CORPORATE CENTRE AT STATE BANK BHAWAN, MADAME CAMA ROAD, MUMBAI-400021. 2:THE STATE BANK OF INDIA MANGALDAI BRANCH REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER HAVING ITS OFFICE AT L.N.B. ROAD MANGALDAI DISTRICT- DARRANG ASSAM PIN-784125 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DARRANG MANGALDAI ASSAM-782105. 4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER PATHARIGHAT REVENUE CIRCLE DISTRICT- DARRANG ASSAM-782105. 5:BABUL ALI S/O LATE TALEB ALI VILLAGE- ATHKURIA MOUZA- SARABARI P.O.- PATHARIGHAT P.S.- SIPAJHAR DISTRICT- DARRANG ASSAM-784144. 6:NABUL ALI S/O LATE TALEB ALI VILLAGE- ATHKURIA MOUZA- SARABARI P.O.- PATHARIGHAT P.S.- SIPAJHAR DISTRICT- DARRANG ASSAM-784144 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. Hoque, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Barua, Junior Government Advocate, Assam for respondent Nos.3 & 4.

Page No.# 2/2

– B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY 14.08.2026 (Ashutosh Kumar, CJ) After some arguments, Mr. S. Hoque, learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application in order to approach the appropriate forum for the needful. In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead