Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/830/2026 of SRI SONTI BAISHYA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 13 August 2026
GAHC010170072026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/830/2026 SRI SONTI BAISHYA SON OF SRI BAKARU BAISHYA, VILLAGE SUNDHIYA, PS RANGIA, DISTRICT KAMRUP, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010170072026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/830/2026
SRI SONTI BAISHYA
SON OF SRI BAKARU BAISHYA, VILLAGE SUNDHIYA, PS RANGIA, DISTRICT KAMRUP, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : KAUSHIK JAIN, MR. S C KEYAL,MS. J BAISHYA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
14.08.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J)
Heard Mr. K. Jain, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 229 days in filing the appeal against the conviction of the applicant under Section 6 of the POCSO Act.
Page No.# 2/2
2. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned.
3. Accordingly, the delay of 229 days is condoned.
4. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same.
5. The I.A. is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant