Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2763/2026 of SHRI BHADRA KANTA BASUMATARY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 12 August 2026
GAHC010183052025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2763/2026 SHRI BHADRA KANTA BASUMATARY SON OF KINAN CHANDRA BASUMATARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE -AULAGURI POST OFFICE-BANARGAON POLICE STATION-DOTMA DISTRICT-KOKRAJHAR BTR
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010183052025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2763/2026
SHRI BHADRA KANTA BASUMATARY
SON OF KINAN CHANDRA BASUMATARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE
-AULAGURI
POST OFFICE-BANARGAON
POLICE STATION-DOTMA
DISTRICT-KOKRAJHAR
BTR
ASSAM PIN-783347
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF HOME
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
DISPUR
GUWAHATI
PIN-781006
2:INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
BTAD
KOKRAJHAR ASSAM CUM APPELLATE AUTHORITY
DISTRICT-KOKRAJHAR
BTR
ASSAM PIN-783370
3:SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
KOKRAJHAR CUM DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY
DISTRICT-KOKRAJHAR
BTR
ASSAM PIN-783370
4:SMTI PUNAM PEGU
ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CRIME DISTRICT- KAMRUP
ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
5:SMTI NABANITA SHARMA
ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE HEAD QUARTER
DHUBRI
ASSAM DISTRICT-DHUBRI
ASSAM PIN-783301
------------
Advocate for : MR. T DEURI
Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 13.08.2026
Heard Ms. L. Wangsa, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that by filing this application, the applicant seeks to amend the address of the respondent Nos. 4 & 5, since, notice could not be affected to them in the old address. The learned counsel submits that if the prayer for amending the address is allowed, the applicant/petitioner would be in a position to take steps upon the said respondents. Mr. A. Chakraborty, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3 submits that he has no objection to the prayer. In view of above, the application stands allowed, as prayed for. The interlocutory application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant