Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3367/2026 of SANOWER RAHMAN, Vs THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 4 ORS on 11 August 2026
GAHC010126172026 2026:GAU-AS:11404 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3367/2026 SANOWER RAHMAN, S/O- NOWSHAD ALI SHEIKH, VILL- NAYAPARA PART-II, P.O- BAHATI, P.S MATIA, DISTRICT - GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN-783125. VERSUS THE STATE
GAHC010126172026
2026:GAU-AS:11404
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3367/2026
SANOWER RAHMAN,
S/O- NOWSHAD ALI SHEIKH, VILL- NAYAPARA PART-II, P.O- BAHATI, P.S
MATIA, DISTRICT - GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN-783125.
VERSUS
THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, HAVING ITS CENTRAL OFFICE AT
STATE BANK OF INDIA BHAVAN, MADAM CAMA ROAD, MUMBAI - 400021.
2:ZONAL MANAGER
STATE BANK OF INDIA
ZONAL OFFICE
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI -781006.
3:THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
SURVEILLANCE INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT
STATE BANK OF INDIA
LOCAL HEAD OFFICE
WEST GANDHI MAIDAN
PATNA
PIN - 800001.
4:THE BRANCH MANAGER
STATE BANK OFINDIA
GOALPARA BRANCH
P.O
P.S. AND DISTRICT- GOALPARA
ASSAM. PIN-783101.
5:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE
MATIA POLICESTATION
DIST- GOALPARA
ASSAM
PIN-783125
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M ALI, MR. J UDDIN
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 12.08.2026
Mr. M. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that since during the pendency of the writ petition, the grievance raised by the petitioner in this writ petition has been mitigated, the petitioner does not want to proceed further with the writ petition. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant