Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5633/2025 of RANJAN KUMAR CHOUDHURY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS on 11 August 2026
GAHC010214322025 2026:GAU-AS:11326 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5633/2025 RANJAN KUMAR CHOUDHURY S/O LT RUHINI KUMAR CHOUDHURY VILL UPAHUPARA PO AND PS MANGALDAI DIST DARRANG ASSAM PIN 784012 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010214322025
2026:GAU-AS:11326
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5633/2025
RANJAN KUMAR CHOUDHURY
S/O LT RUHINI KUMAR CHOUDHURY VILL UPAHUPARA PO AND PS
MANGALDAI DIST DARRANG ASSAM PIN 784012
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
REP BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM DISPUR
GUWAHATI 6
2:THE CHAIRMAN OF STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE (SLC)
FOR APPOINTMENT ON COMPASSIONATE GROUND DISPUR GUWAHATI
781006
3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM PERSONNEL DEPT DISPUR GUWAHATI 6
4:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM
PWD DEPTT DISPUR GUWAHATI 6
5:THE CHIEF PWD DEPTT ROAD
CHANDMARI GHY 3 ASSAM
6:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CIM CHAIRMAN OF DISTRICT LEVEL
COMMITTEE DLC
DARRANG FOR APPOINTMENT ON COMPASSIONATE GROUND DARRANG
ASASM PIN 784125
7:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PWD RURAL ROADS DIVISION MANGALDAI PO AND DIST DARRANG
ASSAM PN 78412
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N HOSSAIN, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, PWD, GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 12.08.2026
Mr. N. Hossain, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there has been some inadvertent defects in the writ petition and therefore he prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant