Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2655/2026 of MS MASUD ENTERPRISE AND TRAVELS Vs THE UNION OF INDIA on 11 August 2026
GAHC010124792026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2655/2026 in WP(C)/3486/2026 MS MASUD ENTERPRISE AND TRAVELS REPRESENTED BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR MASUD RAIHAN SIDDIK VILLAGE BALIDUNGA P.O. P.S. BHURAGAON
GAHC010124792026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2655/2026
in
WP(C)/3486/2026
MS MASUD ENTERPRISE AND TRAVELS
REPRESENTED BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR
MASUD RAIHAN SIDDIK
VILLAGE BALIDUNGA
P.O. P.S. BHURAGAON
DISTRICT MORIGAON
ASSAM
PIN 782121.
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
NORTH BLOCK
NEW DELHI 110001.
2:THE BRANCH MANAGER
INDUSIND BANK
HIBARGAON
NAGAON BRANCH
P.O. NAGAON SADAR
DISTRICT NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN 782001
3:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CYBER CRIME
ASSAM
CID HEADQUARTERS
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI 781007
ASSAM.
4:THE NODAL OFFICER
NATIONAL CYBER CRIME REPORTING PORTAL NCRP
MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
NEW DELHI 110001.
5:THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
GREATER CHENNAI POLICE
CHENNAI SOUTH CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION
CHENNAI 600007
TAMIL NADU
------------
Advocate for : MR N ZAMAN
Advocate for : DY.S.G.I. appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
12-08-20
26 Heard Mr. N. Zaman, learned counsel for the applicant; and Mr. J. K. Goswami, learned Central Government Counsel, for the opposite parties No. 1, 5 and 6 as well as Ms. M. Barman, learned Government Advocate, Assam for the opposite party No.4.
2. This interlocutory application is preferred by the applicant, who has preferred the accompanying writ petition, WP(C) No. 3486/2026, seeking amendment in the Cause-Title of the accompanying writ petition.
3. It is averred that while filing the writ petition, the opposite parties/respondents were inadvertently numbered as respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6 in the Cause Title. It is stated that due to inadvertent typographical and clerical mistakes, serial number “2” was omitted in the Cause-Title. As a result, there is no respondent No. 2 in the accompanying writ petition, although there are
5 (five) respondents.
4. Having regard to the statements and averments made in this interlocutory application and considering the fact that the mistakes in the Cause-Title of the accompanying writ petition appear to be typographical one, the instant interlocutory application stands allowed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant