Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4247/2026 of SRI PRADIP CHANDA AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 11 August 2026
GAHC010165442026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4247/2026 SRI PRADIP CHANDA AND ANR S/O. LT. MANIK CHANDA, R/O. VILLAGE - PAIKAN, P.S. AND DISTRICT - HAILAKANDI, PIN - 788151, ASSAM. 2: SMTI. SHIBANI CHARDA W/O.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010165442026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4247/2026
SRI PRADIP CHANDA AND ANR
S/O. LT. MANIK CHANDA, R/O. VILLAGE - PAIKAN, P.S. AND DISTRICT - HAILAKANDI, PIN - 788151, ASSAM.
2: SMTI. SHIBANI CHARDA
W/O. KAWSIK CHANDA
R/O. VILLAGE - PAIKAN
P.S. AND DISTRICT - HAILAKANDI
PIN - 788151
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
TO BE REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT
DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006.
2:DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
HAILAKANDI
ASSAM
PIN - 788151.
3:ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER (REVENUE)
HAILAKANDI
ASSAM
PIN - 788151.
4:MAKHANLAL CHANDA
S/O. LT. MAHENDRA KUMAR CHANDA
R/O. VILLAGE AND P.O. PAIKAN
P.S. AND DISTRICT - HAILAKANDI
PIN - 788151
ASSA
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N H MAZARBHUIYAN, OSINAM TAYENG,MR. YEKA
AWOMI,MR. M H SAIKIA,MR R I BHUYAN,I S MAZARBHUIYAN,MS. L WAJEEDA
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 12.08.2026 Heard Mr. I.S. Mazarbhuiyan, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent no. 1; and Mr. N. Das, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 2 & 3. At the inception, the learned counsel for the State respondents have raised objection regarding vagueness and lack of proper details in the writ petition regarding any right title and interest over the concerned plots of land in favour of the petitioners. Mr. Mazarbhuiyan, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh with full particulars. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Mazarbhuiyan, learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as sought for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant