Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/5863/2024 of NURJAMAL SHEIKH AND 2 ORS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS on 11 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010238522024 2026:GAU-AS:11347 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5863/2024 NURJAMAL SHEIKH AND 2 ORS S/O- FAYEZUDDIN SHEIKH, VILLAGE RAJAPARA PART I 2: MOMTAZ BEGUM W/O- ABUL HUSSAIN VILLAGE RAJAPARA PART I 3: SAMINA BIBI

GAHC010238522024

2026:GAU-AS:11347

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/5863/2024

NURJAMAL SHEIKH AND 2 ORS

S/O- FAYEZUDDIN SHEIKH,

VILLAGE RAJAPARA PART I

2: MOMTAZ BEGUM

W/O- ABUL HUSSAIN

VILLAGE RAJAPARA PART I

3: SAMINA BIBI

D/O- GIYASHUDDIN SHEIKH

VILLAGE RAJAPARA PART I

ALL ARE R/O- P.O AND P.S- BAGRIBARI

DIST- KOKRAJHAR

BTC

ASSAM

PIN-78334

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS

REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPTT.

DISPUR, GHY-06.

2:THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

KOKRAJHAR

ASSAM

PIN-783370

3:THE SECRETARY

LAND

REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT

KOKRAJHAR

ASSAM

PIN-783370

4:THE DIRECTOR

OF LAND

RECORDS

BTC

KOKRAJHAR

ASSAM

PIN-783370

5:THE SUB DIVISIONAL LAND ADVISORY COMMITTEE

PARBATJHORA

REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN

P.O AND P.S- BAGRIBARI

KOKRAJHAR

ASSAM

PIN-783349

6:THE CIRCLE OFFICER

BAGRIBARI REVENUE CIRCLE

CUM MEMBER SECRETARY

SUB DIVISIONAL LAND ADVISORY COMMITTEE

PARBATJHORA

P.O AND P.S- BAGRIBARI

KOKRAJHAR

ASSAM

PIN-78334

Advocate for the Petitioner : MD H R AHMED, M BEGUM

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, SC, BTC

BEFORE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

12.08.2026.

Heard Mr. H.R. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. N. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, BTC appearing for respondent

Nos. 2—5 as well as Ms. G. Hazarika, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department appearing for the respondent No. 1. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 20.07.2026, whereby a final opportunity was granted to the learned Standing Counsel, BTC to provide the instruction as to why the petitioners’ application seeking settlement of land, which has already been recommended by the Land Advisory Committee has not been considered. Today, when the matter is called, Ms. Choudhury, the learned Standing Counsel, BTC places the instruction dated 11.08.2026, received from the Secretary, BTC, Kokrajhar to the effect that the application of the petitioners seeking settlement of the land has already been settled in their favour. Mr. Ahmed, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the aforesaid settlement order, nothing survives for adjudication in the present writ petition. In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present writ petition stands closed, on being infructuous. The copy of the instruction dated 11.08.2026, produced before this Court by Ms. Choudhury, the learned Standing Counsel, BTC be kept in the record.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead