Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3890/2025 of JAMANUL WARIS TALUKDAR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS. on 11 August 2026
GAHC010148282025 2026:GAU-AS:11426 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3890/2025 JAMANUL WARIS TALUKDAR SON OF MD. HAZARAT ALI TALUKDAR R/O NIKARIPARA, LAKHIPUR P.O. AND P.S. LAKHIPUR DIST. GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN-783129. VERSUS THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010148282025
2026:GAU-AS:11426
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3890/2025
JAMANUL WARIS TALUKDAR
SON OF MD. HAZARAT ALI TALUKDAR
R/O NIKARIPARA, LAKHIPUR
P.O. AND P.S. LAKHIPUR
DIST. GOALPARA, ASSAM,
PIN-783129.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
3:THE DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION
ASSAM DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
4:THE DIRECTOR FINANCE (ECONOMIC AFFAIRS)
ASSAM DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
GOALPARA
ASSAM.
6:THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER
Page No.# 2/2
GOALPARA
ASSAM.
7:THE CHAIRPERSON
LAKHIPUR MUNICIPAL BOARD
OFFICE OF THE LAKHIPUR MUNICIPAL BOARD
LAKHIPUR
GOALPARA PIN-783129.
8:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER
LAKHIPUR MUNICIPAL BOARD
LAKHIPUR GOALPARA
PIN-783129
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. N. Adhyapak For the Respondent(s) : Mr. M. Chetia, Govt. Advocate BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
12.08.2026
Mr. S. N. Adhyapak, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has already been paid the contractual dues, and as such, nothing further survives.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as it has become infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant