Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3960/2026 of DHANANJOY KUMAR NATH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS on 11 August 2026
GAHC010154422026 2026:GAU-AS:11393 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3960/2026 DHANANJOY KUMAR NATH SON OF LATE JATIN KUMAR NATH, R/O- VILLAGE - PHULARGURI, P.O.- KAYAKUCHI, DISTRICT - BARPETA, ASSAM., PIN- 781352 VERSUS THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010154422026
2026:GAU-AS:11393
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3960/2026
DHANANJOY KUMAR NATH
SON OF LATE JATIN KUMAR NATH, R/O- VILLAGE - PHULARGURI, P.O.- KAYAKUCHI, DISTRICT - BARPETA, ASSAM., PIN- 781352
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, GOVT. OF
ASSAM, HANDLOOM AND TEXTILE DEPARTMENT, GUWAHATI-6
2:THE DIRECTOR
HANDLOOM AND TEXTILE DEPARTMENT
GOPINATH BORDOLOI ROAD
AMBATI
GUWAHATI- 781001
3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
HILL AREAS DEPARTMENT
GOVT OF ASSAM
DISPUR
GUWAHATI
GUWAHATI- 781006
4:THE KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL
REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DIPHU
ASSAM
5:THE SECRETARY
PERSONNEL (B) DEPARTMENT
KAAC
DIPHU
ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
6:THE JOINT SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF HANDLOOM AND TEXTILES
KAAC
DIPHU
ASSAM
7:THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
HANDLOOM AND TEXTILES
WEST KARBI ANGLONG
HAMREN
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M DUTTA, MR S K CHHETRY,MR. N UDDIN,L DEKA
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, K A A C,SC, HANDLOOM AND TEXTILE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 12-08-2026
Mr. N Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition because another writ petition seeking the same relief is already pending before this Court namely, WP(C) No. 3861/2026. He submits that this has occurred since he was not informed about the pendency of the earlier writ petition. Accordingly, as prayed for, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. JUDGE Comparing Assistant