Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/6199/2024 of ARABINDA DEKA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 6 August 2026
GAHC010245712024 2026:GAU-AS:11101 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6199/2024 ARABINDA DEKA SON OF SRI BASANTA DEKA, RESIDENT OF ALENGIDOL, NEAR KALI MANDIR, NALBARI, P.O. AND P.S.- NALBARI, PIN- 781334, ASSAM. VERSUS THE
GAHC010245712024
2026:GAU-AS:11101
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6199/2024
ARABINDA DEKA
SON OF SRI BASANTA DEKA,
RESIDENT OF ALENGIDOL,
NEAR KALI MANDIR, NALBARI,
P.O. AND P.S.- NALBARI,
PIN- 781334, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT,
DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 6.
2:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
KAMRUP
AMINGAON
PIN- 781031.
3:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE
RANGIA POLICE STATION
RANGIA
DISTRICT- KAMRUP
ASSAM
PIN- 781354.
4:THE BRANCH MANAGER
BANDHAN BANK
NALBARI BRANCH
HAJO ROAD
NEAR NALBARI POLICE STATION
WARD NO.-07
P.O.- NALBARI
DIST.- NALBARI
ASSAM
PIN- 781335.
5:THE BRANCH MANAGER
BANDHAN BANK
RANGIA BRANCH
WARD NO.-4
N.T. ROAD
P.O.- RANGIA
DIST.- KAMRUP
ASSAM
PIN- 781354
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. D. J. Haloi, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. M. Sharma, Advocate BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 07.08.2026
Mr. D. J. Haloi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that in pursuance to the order dated 17.07.2026, he has obtained instructions not to pursue with the present proceedings and file appropriate application before the Court of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rangia for removing the attachment from the Petitioner’s bank account. He submitted that the withdrawal of the instant application should not prejudice or preclude the Petitioner in filing such application.
2. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
3. The closure of the instant writ petition shall not prejudice or preclude the Petitioner from approaching the appropriate forum for the release of the attachment from his bank account.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant