Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/118/2026 of AYNUL HOQUE ALIAS AINUL HAQUE Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 5 August 2026
GAHC010023642026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/118/2026 AYNUL HOQUE ALIAS AINUL HAQUE SON OF IMAN ALI R/O H. NO. 9, CHITRALEKHA PATH BHAGADUTTAPUR, KAHILIPARA, P.S. DISPUR, P.O. KAHILIPARA, PIN NO.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010023642026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/118/2026
AYNUL HOQUE ALIAS AINUL HAQUE
SON OF IMAN ALI R/O H. NO. 9, CHITRALEKHA PATH BHAGADUTTAPUR, KAHILIPARA, P.S. DISPUR, P.O. KAHILIPARA, PIN NO. 781019,DIST.
KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP BY PP ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M RAHMAN, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : OTC/0/0
AYNUL HOQUE ALIAS AINUL HAQUE
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
ASSAM
------------
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for : MR. M RAHMAN
Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 06-08-2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mr. M. Rahman, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. R. Mondal appearing on behalf of Mr. S.K. Poddar, learned counsel for the respondent No.2. Mr. M. Rahman, learned counsel for the applicant prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the application, stating that the applicant does not wish to make a challenge to the Non Bailable Warrant of Arrest issued against the applicant. After hearing the counsels for the parties at some length, we allow the prayer of the learned counsel for the applicant for withdrawal. The I.A. is hereby dismissed as withdrawn, inasmuch as, the applicant has also been appearing before the learned Family Court, thereby appearing in two forums for the same matter in issue, which cannot be allowed.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant