Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/1114/2025 of JATINDRA BARUAH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. on 5 August 2026
GAHC010036612025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1114/2025 JATINDRA BARUAH S/O- LATE MANIK CHANDRA BARUAH, R/O- VILL- JIAMORA GAON, PO- DHAKUAKHANA DIST- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM, PIN- 787055. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010036612025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1114/2025
JATINDRA BARUAH
S/O- LATE MANIK CHANDRA BARUAH, R/O- VILL- JIAMORA GAON, PO- DHAKUAKHANA DIST- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM, PIN- 787055.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF
ASSAM, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 06.
2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT
ASSAM
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI-3.
3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT
DHAKUAKHANA
LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
PIN- 787055.
4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
5:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT (GENERAL) DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
Page No.# 2/2
GUWAHATI-6.
6:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
LAKHIMPUR
NORTH LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
PIN- 787001
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR J PAYENG, MS A PAYENG,MS. SUSMITA DOLEY
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE,SC, FINANCE,SC, WATER
RESOURCE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
06.08.2026 Ms. A. Payeng, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though the grievance of the petitioner was relating to non release of contractual bills, after filing of the writ petition, the bills have been cleared. She accordingly submits that she would not like to press the writ petition, any further. Also heard Shri R. Talukdar, learned State Counsel; Shri Satyajit Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department; Shri M. Bhuyan, learned counsel representing the Finance Department; Shri R. M. Das, learned Standing Counsel, Water Resources Department. Writ petition accordingly stands closed as not pressed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant