Gauhati High Court
AB/1723/2026 of BADAL DAS AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 4 August 2026
GAHC010154512026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1723/2026 BADAL DAS AND ANR SON OF GANGA CHARAN DAS, 2: GANGA CHARAN DAS S/O- LATE KALI CHARAN DAS BOTH ARE R/O VILL PIJUPARA LAKHANPUR P.S NAGARBERA DIST KAMRUP ASSA VERSUS THE
GAHC010154512026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1723/2026
BADAL DAS AND ANR
SON OF GANGA CHARAN DAS,
2: GANGA CHARAN DAS
S/O- LATE KALI CHARAN DAS
BOTH ARE R/O VILL PIJUPARA
LAKHANPUR
P.S NAGARBERA
DIST KAMRUP
ASSA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A PARAMANIK, P. KALITA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 05.08.2026 Heard Ms. P. Kalita, learned counsel appearing for the applicants. Also heard Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Senior Counsel/ Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Ms. R. Saloi, appearing for the State respondent. By way of this application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, the applicants, i.e, Badal Das and Ganga Charan Das, sought for grant of pre-arrest bail in apprehension that in connection with an incident that has occurred on 04.07.2026, where by one Smt. Namita Das forcibly entered into the house of the applicants and insisted for marriage on the claim of being in relationship with the applicant No. 1. Accordingly, a report was call for from the jurisdictional police station as whether any FIR in connection with the said incident has been lodged against the accused/applicants. Today when the matter was called, Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, upon instructions received from the jurisdictional police station submitted that as on yesterday, i.e., 04.08.2026, no case whatsoever had been lodged against the accused/applicants. That being so, the instant anticipatory bail application is not maintainable. A copy of the report received from the Officer-in-Charge,
Nagarbera Police Station dated 04.08.2026 as placed before the learned Additional Public Prosecutor is kept on record and marked as “X”. Resultantly, the Anticipatory Bail Application stands dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant