Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3983/2026 of SMTI RAMBHA DEVI AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. on 4 August 2026
GAHC010155962026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3983/2026 SMTI RAMBHA DEVI AND ANR W/O RAM TAPOISHY THAKUR RESIDENT OF NO. 1 NAMONIGAON, MOUZA BALIPARA, P.O. P.S. RANGAPARA, DISTRICT SONITPUR, ASSAM 2: SRI
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010155962026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3983/2026
SMTI RAMBHA DEVI AND ANR
W/O RAM TAPOISHY THAKUR
RESIDENT OF NO. 1 NAMONIGAON, MOUZA BALIPARA, P.O. P.S.
RANGAPARA, DISTRICT SONITPUR, ASSAM
2: SRI HIMANGSHU THAKUR
S/O RAM TAPOISHY THAKUR
RESIDENT OF NO. 1 NAMONIGAON
MOUZA BALIPARA
P.O. AND P.S. RANGAPARA
DISTRICT SONITPUR
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-
781006.
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
SONITPUR
TEZPUR
ASSAM.
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
NADUAR REVENUE CIRCLE
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSAM
4:SRI AMRITI KHAKLARI
Page No.# 2/2
SOUTH HOIBORGAON
DIST. NAGAON- 782002
5:THE CO- DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
NADUAR
DISTRICT- SONITPUR
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P SUNDI, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 05.08.2026 Mr. P. Sundi, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he has received instruction from his clients not to press the writ petition. Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent no. 1 and Mr. N. Das, learned Junior Government Advocate for the respondent nos. 2 & 3 are present. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Sundi, learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant