Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4103/2026 of SMTI MAYURAKHI BORA Vs THE GOLAGHAT MUNICIPALITY BOARD AND 3 ORS on 4 August 2026
GAHC010156992026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4103/2026 SMTI MAYURAKHI BORA W/O- LATE ABHIJIT DUTTA, NEAR SHANI MANDIR, ARENGAPARA CHARIALI, WARD NO.1, GOLAGHAT, DIST- GOLAGHAT, ASSAM, PIN- 785621. VERSUS THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010156992026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4103/2026
SMTI MAYURAKHI BORA
W/O- LATE ABHIJIT DUTTA, NEAR SHANI MANDIR, ARENGAPARA
CHARIALI, WARD NO.1, GOLAGHAT, DIST- GOLAGHAT, ASSAM, PIN-
785621.
VERSUS
THE GOLAGHAT MUNICIPALITY BOARD AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, THE OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN, GOLAGHAT MUNICIPALITY BOARD, COURT ROAD, GOLAGHAT, ASSAM, PIN- 785621.
2:THE CHAIRMAN
THE OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN
GOLAGHAT MUNICIPALITY BOARD
COURT ROAD
GOLAGHAT
ASSAM PIN- 785621.
3:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER
THEOFFICE OF THE GOLAGHAT MUNICIPALITY BOARD
COURT ROAD
GOLAGHAT
ASSAM
PIN- 785621.
4:THE WARD MEMBER
WARD NO.8
THE OFFICE OF THE GOLAGHAT MUNICIPALITY BOARD
COURT ROAD
GOLAGHAT
ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
PIN- 785621
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H P GUWALA, S FAZIL,S SATNAMI
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 05.08.2026 Heard Mr. H.P. Guwala, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner wants to withdraw this writ petition in order to approach the appropriate authority for issuance of certificate on the subject – ‘local certification’, with liberty to approach again, if any subsequent cause arises thereafter. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Guwala, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as sought for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant