Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/279/2025 of SUSHIL DAS @ SUSHIL KUMAR NAMA DAS Vs DIBAKAR NATH, IAS AND ANR on 4 August 2026
GAHC010138822026 2026:GAU-AS:10896 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/279/2025 SUSHIL DAS @ SUSHIL KUMAR NAMA DAS S/O LT. YUDHISTHIR DAS R/O BALIJAN NO. GAON P.O.- BAKALIA GHAT P.S.- BAKALIA GHAT DIST- KARBI ANGLONG
GAHC010138822026
2026:GAU-AS:10896
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/279/2025
SUSHIL DAS @ SUSHIL KUMAR NAMA DAS
S/O LT. YUDHISTHIR DAS
R/O BALIJAN NO. GAON
P.O.- BAKALIA GHAT
P.S.- BAKALIA GHAT
DIST- KARBI ANGLONG (ASSAM)
PIN-782482
VERSUS
DIBAKAR NATH
IAS AND ANR
THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN-783301
2:PRANJAL KUMAR DAS
ACS
THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER (REVENUE BRANCH)
DHUBRI
ASSAM-783301
------------
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. U. Mondol, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. J. Handique, Jr. GA, Assam
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 05.08.2026
The present application has been filed alleging willful and deliberate violation to the order dated 05.02.2025 passed in WP(C) No.6980/2024 whereby there was a specific direction upon the Respondent No.3 therein i.e. the Additional District Commissioner (Revenue Branch), Dhubri to furnish the list of documents which according to him were not submitted by the Petitioner with the application dated 26.07.2024 within 7 (seven) working days from the date of submission of the certified copy of the order at the Office of the Respondent No.3.
2. The grievance of the Petitioner herein that in spite of the certified copy being submitted, the Respondent No.3 in the writ petition had not furnished the list of documents and it is under such circumstances, the present contempt application has been filed.
3. This Court had issued notice on 30.05.2025. None of the Respondents have put in their appearance. It is under such circumstances, on 13.07.2026, this Court requested Mr. J. Handique, the learned Junior Government Advocate to obtain instructions as to why the order dated 05.02.2025 passed in WP(C) No.6980/2024 have not yet been complied with.
4. In the said order, this Court further categorically directed the Additional District Commissioner, (Revenue Branch) Dhubri to furnish the list of documents to Mr. J. Handique, the learned Junior Government Advocate so that the same may be placed before this Court on the next date.
5. This Court put a specific query upon Mr. J. Handique, the learned Junior Government Advocate as to whether in compliance to the order dated 13.07.2026, the Additional District Commissioner (Revenue Branch) Dhubri has provided the list of documents to him.
6. Mr. J. Handique, the learned Junior Government Advocate has placed before this Court an instruction dated 03.08.2026 issued by the District Commissioner, Dhubri. Along with the said parawise comments, the list of insufficient documents were also furnished as Annexure-A. From a perusal of the said list of documents enclosed as Anenxure-A, it appears that the seller’s name was found mismatched with the land record and the application and name correction affidavit was not submitted. In addition to that, the affidavit by the buyer was incomplete as the consideration amount was not mentioned therein. The instructions along with the enclosure which is the list of insufficient documents are collectively kept on record and marked with the letter “X”.
7. Taking into account the above, it is the opinion of this Court that nothing further remains in the instant proceedings to be proceeded with for which the instant proceedings stands dropped.
8. The Court Master of this Court is directed to provide a true copy of the document which is marked with the letter “X” to Mr. M. U. Mondol, the learned counsel for doing the needful.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant