Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/2337/2026 of SRI PUNYA RAM BAISHYA Vs SRI PREETOM SAIKIA, IAS AND ORS on 30 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010145292026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2337/2026 SRI PUNYA RAM BAISHYA S/O- LATE LALIT BAISHYA, C/O- SRI DIPUL BAISHYA, R/O- VILLAGE- MILAN NAGAR, P.O.- MADHYA KHANDA, DISTRICTKAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN-

GAHC010145292026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2337/2026

SRI PUNYA RAM BAISHYA

S/O- LATE LALIT BAISHYA, C/O- SRI DIPUL BAISHYA, R/O- VILLAGE- MILAN NAGAR, P.O.- MADHYA KHANDA, DISTRICTKAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN- 781030, PHONE NO.- 6000796057.

VERSUS

SRI PREETOM SAIKIA, IAS AND ORS

COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6

2:SRI BHARAT BHUSAN DEV CHOUDHURY

SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM

SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHTI-6.

3:SRI NARAYAN KONWAR

SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM

DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

DISPUR

GUWAHATI- 6

4:MS MAMATA HOJAI

AES

DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION

ASSAM

KAHILIPARA

GUWAHATI-19

5:SRI RATUL KUMAR DAS

INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS

DARRANG DISTRICT CIRCLE

MANGALDOI

PIN-784125SRI BHABEN DEURY

INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS

UDALGURI DISTRICT CIRCLE

UDALGURI

6:SRI BHABEN DEURY

INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS. UDALGURI DISTRICT CIRCLE

UDALGURI

7:SRI BHAJAN SARKAR

HEADMASTER

TANGLA MODEL SCHOOL

TANGLA

UDALGURI SERIAL NO.5

6 AND 7 TO BE NEWLY IMPLEADED AS CONTEMNORS/RESPONDENT

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M BHAGABATI, MS. K AKHTAR,MS G BORA,MS. B

TALUKDAR,M P DAS

Advocate for the Respondent : MS. N PHUKAN, MR S M T CHISTIE (R4)

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 31.07.2026 Heard Mr. M. Bhagabati, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Ms. N. Phukan, learned counsel appearing for the contemnor No. 1. By way of the present interlocutory application, the applicant seeks impleadment of the incumbents holding the posts of Inspector of Schools, Darrang District Circle, Mangaldoi; Inspector of Schools, Udalguri District Circle, Udalguri; and Headmaster, Tangla Model School, Tangla, Udalguri, as newly impleaded contemnor Nos. 5, 6 and

7, respectively, in the connected Cont.Cas(C) No. 556/2020. It appears that at the time of institution of the connected contempt petition, the incumbents to the aforesaid posts were not arrayed as contemnors. The present application has been filed on the ground that, upon realizing that the said officials are also responsible for implementation of the directions contained in the order of this Court dated 20.11.2019 passed in WP(C) No. 6279/2017, and that they have allegedly failed to comply with the said directions, their impleadment has become necessary for effective adjudication of the contempt proceedings. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials available on record. From the pleadings, it appears that the incumbents to the aforesaid posts are alleged to have failed to take the necessary steps for release of the salary of the petitioner in terms of the judgment and order dated 20.11.2019 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 6279/2017. In the opinion of this Court, their presence is necessary for the effective and complete adjudication of the contempt proceedings. Accordingly, the following officials are impleaded as contemnor Nos. 5, 6 and 7, respectively, in Cont.Cas(C) No. 556/2020:

5. Sri Ratul Kumar Das, Inspector of Schools, Darrang District Circle, Mangaldoi,

6. Sri Bhaben Deury, Inspector of Schools, Udalguri District Circle, Udalguri

7. Sri Bhajan Sarkar, Headmaster, Tangla Model School, Tangla, Udalguri. The interlocutory application is, accordingly, allowed. The Registry shall carry out the necessary amendment in the cause title upon filing of an amended memo of parties by the applicant. Thereafter, necessary steps shall be taken for issuance of notice to the newly impleaded contemnor Nos. 5, 6 and 7 in accordance with law. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead