Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/1755/2026 of JAYANTA HAZARIKA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. on 30 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010104582026 2026:GAU- AS:10542-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1755/2026 JAYANTA HAZARIKA SON OF LOKNATH HAZARIKA, RESIDENT OF VILL. TATIBAHAR, P.O.- PADMAPUR, P.S.- NARAYANPUR, DISTRICT- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM, PIN-

GAHC010104582026

2026:GAU-

AS:10542-DB

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1755/2026

JAYANTA HAZARIKA

SON OF LOKNATH HAZARIKA, RESIDENT OF VILL. TATIBAHAR, P.O.- PADMAPUR, P.S.- NARAYANPUR, DISTRICT- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM, PIN-

784164.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.

REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PANJABARI, GUWAHATI- 37.

2:THE COMMISSIONER

PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

PANJABARI

GUWAHATI- 37.

3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

LAKHIMPUR -CUM- DISTRICT PROGRAMME CO-ORDINATOR (MGNREGA)

LAKHIMPUR

ASSAM.

4:THE PROJECT DIRECTOR

DRDA

LAKHIMPUR

ASSAM

5:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

NARAYANPUR DEVELOPMENT BLOCK

LAKHIMPUR

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K MIRA, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., GA, ASSAM

BEFORE

HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

31-07-2026 (Arun Dev Choudhury, J)

1. We have heard Mr. K. Mira, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant and Mr. S. Baruah, learned counsel for the respondent/opposite party Nos. 3 & 5.

2. The present Interlocutory Application has been filed by the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of the delay of 44 days in preferring the connected Writ Appeal against the order dated 06.03.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No. 1662/2020.

3. Perused the averments made in the application.

4. After going through the averments made in the application, we are satisfied that good grounds have been assigned by the applicant/appellant for condoning the delay of 44 days in preferring the connected appeal.

5. We, therefore, condone the delay.

6. The Interlocutory Application stands disposed off.

7. Registry to process the connected appeal and, if the same is found defect free, list it on 09.10.2026 under the appropriate heading.

JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE

Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead