Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/70/2026 of M/S DROMOS ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS OPC PRIVATE LIMITED Vs M/S KHAGEMBA TRANSMISSION AND CONSTRUCTION on 30 July 2026
GAHC010155212026 2026:GAU-AS:10614 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Cont.Cas(C)/70/2026 M/S DROMOS ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS OPC PRIVATE LIMITED REGISTERED OFFICE AT VILL- SHALJHAR P.O. KHATUL HOOGLY WEST BENGAL-712611 REPRESENTED BY ITS
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010155212026
2026:GAU-AS:10614
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Cont.Cas(C)/70/2026
M/S DROMOS ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS OPC PRIVATE LIMITED
REGISTERED OFFICE AT VILL- SHALJHAR
P.O. KHATUL HOOGLY
WEST BENGAL-712611
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR
MR PARTHA SARATHI DUTTA
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS.
VERSUS
M/S KHAGEMBA TRANSMISSION AND CONSTRUCTION
HEAD OFFICE AT PISHUMTHONG OINAM LEIKAI
IMPHAL WEST
MANIPUR-795001
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER
MR LANGPOKLAKPAM TOMBA SINGH
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
R/O PISHUMTHONG OINAM LEIKAI
IMPHAL WEST
MANIPUR- 795001.
Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. M Beria Advocate for the respondent(s):
B E F O R E
Page No.# 2/2
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
31.07.2026
Heard Mr. M Beria, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
2. The present application has been filed alleging willful and deliberate violation to the order dated 28.08.2025 passed in IA(C)No.1963/2025 arising out of Title Suit No.2974/2025.
3. It is the case of the petitioner herein that there was an undertaking given by the respondent herein that the respondent would be present and ready to sign the cheque for withdrawal of money and this undertaking has been violated.
4. This Court has duly perused the application and is of the opinion that the instant application is not maintainable inasmuch as there cannot be initiation of contempt proceedings against a non-natural person.
5. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings stands dismissed.
6. The dismissal of the instant petition shall not preclude the petitioner to file an application initiating contempt proceedings against the persons, who are responsible and conducting the business on behalf of the respondent herein.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant