Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/1323/2016 of GIRISH CHANDRA DEKA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 30 July 2026
GAHC010107932016 2026:GAU-AS:10621 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1323/2016 GIRISH CHANDRA DEKA S/O LT. TARA NATH DEKA, R/O M.G. ROAD, NEAR RAJ BHAWAN, P.O. UZANBAZAR, P.S. LATASIL, DIST- KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE
GAHC010107932016
2026:GAU-AS:10621
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1323/2016
GIRISH CHANDRA DEKA
S/O LT. TARA NATH DEKA, R/O M.G. ROAD, NEAR RAJ BHAWAN, P.O.
UZANBAZAR, P.S. LATASIL, DIST- KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
REVENUE DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6, DIST- KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM
2:THE DY. COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP METRO
GHY-1
DIST- KAMRUP METRO
ASSAM
3:THE COMMISSIONER
GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER
GHY-1
4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PWD ROAD
GUWAHATI CITY DIVISION-II
CHANDMARI
GHY-2
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. J. Baruah, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Ms. N. Bordoloi, SC, Revenue Mr. S. Borah, SC, GMC
Mr. M. Bhuyan, SC PWDR
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
31.07.2026
Heard Mr. M. J. Baruah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner. Ms. N. Bordoloi, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Revenue Department; Mr. S. Borah, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the GMC and Mr. M. Bhuyan, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the PWD (Roads).
2. Mr. M. J. Baruah, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that taking into account the stand which has been taken by the Respondent Authorities to the effect that only the land covered by Dag No.1381 (new) has been used for the purpose of construction of the road and disputed questions arise as to whether it is the land of the Petitioner wherein construction has been carried out, the Petitioner would not like to pursue the present proceedings. The learned counsel for the Petitioner, however, submitted that the withdrawal of the instant writ petition should not affect the rights of the Petitioner to approach the competent Court of Civil Jurisdiction or the appropriate forum, if so advised.
3. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
4. Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to approach the appropriate forum, if so advised.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant