Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/214/2025 of DIBAKAR THAKURIA Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 8 ORS on 30 July 2026
GAHC010006122025 2026:GAU-AS:10630 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/214/2025 DIBAKAR THAKURIA S/O- LATE LOHIT CHANDRA THAKURIA, PERMANENT R/O- MEDHIKUCHI, P.O- HATHINAPUR, DIST- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781325 VERSUS THE UNION OF
GAHC010006122025
2026:GAU-AS:10630
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/214/2025
DIBAKAR THAKURIA
S/O- LATE LOHIT CHANDRA THAKURIA,
PERMANENT R/O- MEDHIKUCHI,
P.O- HATHINAPUR,
DIST- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781325
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 8 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE MINISTRY OF HOME
AFFAIRS, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI-01
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL
CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE
BLOCK NO. 13
CGO COMPLEX
LODHI ROAD
NEW DELHI-03
3:DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF WORKS
CENTRAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (CPWD)
NIRMAN BHAWAN
NEW DELHI-11
4:DIRECTORATE OF ESTATES
NIRMAN BHAWAN
NEW DELHI-11
5:THE COMMANDANT
CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE
NORTH EASTERN SECTOR
HQRS
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN-781040
6:THE ASSISTANT COMMANDANT
CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE
NORTH EASTERN SECTOR
HQRS
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN-781040
7:THE SENIOR COMMANDANT
CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE
UNIT
OIL DULIAJAN
DIST- DIBRUGARH
ASSAM
PIN-786602
8:THE SSISTANT COMMANDANT/QM
CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE
UNIT
OIL DULIAJAN
DIST- DIBRUGARH
ASSAM
PIN-786602
9:EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
ASSAM AVIATION DIVISION
CENTRAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
KAHIKUCHI BAZAR
BORJHAR
GUWAHATI
PIN-78101
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. Mahanta, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. D. J. Das, Advocate
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
31.07.2026
Heard Mr. M. Mahanta, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner. Mr. D. J. Das, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Respondents Nos.1 to 9.
2. This Court duly takes note of that vide the order dated 16.06.2026, the present proceedings were referred to a Mediator for an amicable settlement by way of mediation. This Court further takes note of that the Mediator has submitted a Memorandum of Settlement dated 31.07.2026 which is kept on record and marked with the letter "X."
3. This Court has duly heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties and has also perused the Memorandum of Settlement. The said Memorandum of Settlement is kept on record and marked with the letter "X."
4. It is the opinion of this Court that the Memorandum of Settlement so arrived at is a fair resolution to the dispute raised in the present proceedings and the same has been arrived at without any fraud and coercion.
5. This Court also takes note of the submission of Mr. D. J.
Das, the learned counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 9 that the present settlement is specific to the Petitioner and should not be treated as a precedence.
6. Accordingly, the parties to the present proceedings shall be bound by the terms and conditions of the Memorandum of Settlement which is kept on record and marked with the letter "X". The terms of the Memorandum of Settlement shall be deemed to be directions passed by this Court.
7. This Court also observes that the Terms of Settlement entered into in the present proceedings shall be specific to the Petitioner only and shall not later on be applied as a precedent for other cases.
8. With the above, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant