Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2385/2026 of DR. NEELAKSHI SARMA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 30 July 2026
GAHC010087072026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2385/2026 DR. NEELAKSHI SARMA W/O- LATE HARPIT SINGH, R/O. HOUSE NO. 62, SOLAPARA ROAD, P.S. AND P.O. PALTAN BAZAR, GHY-781008,KAMRUP (M) ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010087072026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2385/2026
DR. NEELAKSHI SARMA
W/O- LATE HARPIT SINGH, R/O. HOUSE NO. 62, SOLAPARA ROAD, P.S. AND
P.O. PALTAN BAZAR, GHY-781008,KAMRUP (M) ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
DEPARTMENT OF HOME, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006.
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
ASSAM
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI - 781007.
3:THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
GUWAHATI
KAMRUP METRO
GUWAHATI - 781001.
4:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE
PALTAN BAZAR POLICE STATION GUWAHATI
- 78100
Advocate for the petitioner(s): Ms. A Khasnobish
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. N Das Govt. Advocate, Assam B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
31.07.2026 Heard Ms. A Khasnobish, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N Das, the learned Govt. Advocate, Assam.
2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by the non-registration of the FIR filed by the petitioner against the accused persons as per law.
3. It is the opinion of this Court that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the non- registration of the FIR, the remedy of the petitioner lies under Section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
4. Taking into account the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, reported in (2008)2 SCC 409, this Court is not inclined to entertain the instant writ petition.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed being not entertained.
6. The dismissal of the instant writ petition shall not prejudice the rights of the petitioner to approach the concerned Jurisdictional Magistrate, if so advised. JUDGE Comparing Assistant