Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2456/2026 of THE PRINCIPAL GURU CHARAN COLLEGE Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS on 29 July 2026
GAHC010153802026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2456/2026 THE PRINCIPAL GURU CHARAN COLLEGE SILCHAR PO SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 788004 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY AND
GAHC010153802026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2456/2026
THE PRINCIPAL GURU CHARAN COLLEGE
SILCHAR PO SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 788004
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY AND COMMISSIONER TO THE GOVT
OF ASSAM EDUCATION HIGHER DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006
2:THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION
ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI 781019
3:THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION
ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI 781019
4:DR NANDITA PAUL
DAUGHTER OF LATE BINANDA PAUL VILLAGE AND PO KABUGANJ
DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 78812
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SISHIR DUTTA, MR. SIDHANT DUTTA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HIGHER EDU, DR G J SHARMA,MR S NATH
Linked Case : WP(C)/3242/2024
DR NANDITA PAUL
DAUGHTER OF LATE BINANDA PAUL
VILL. AND P.O.- KABUGANJ
DIST.- CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 788121.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY AND COMMISSIONER TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
EDUCATION (HIGHER) DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006.
2:THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI
PIN- 781019.
3:THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI
PIN- 781019.
4:THE PRINCIPAL
GURU CHARAN COLLEGE
SILCHAR
P.O.- SILCHAR
DIST.- CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 788004.
------------
Advocate for : MR S NATH
Advocate for : SC
HIGHER EDU appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
30.07.2026
Mr. Sishir Dutta, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that he has received appropriate reports from the respondent No.4, that is the Principal of college, to show that each of the candidates, whose applications were found to be in order, had been called for the interview by sending them intimation under registered post at the addresses given in the applications. He, therefore, submits that the college had made efforts to inform all the eligible candidates and thereafter, the interview was properly undertaken. Mr. A.R. Tahbildar, learned Standing Counsel for the Higher Education Department has submitted that when the question was raised before the college authorities during the inquiry, the college authorities failed to produce this records and therefore, the Director of Higher Education had required a re- advertisement for the post. Giving an give an opportunity to Mr. A.R. Tahbildar, learned counsel appearing for the Director of Higher Education Department to present the instructions on behalf of the college before the Director of Higher Education, I deem it fit to allow the respondent no.4 to bring on record, the documents produced today, by way of an affidavit, within a period of 10(ten) days from today.
Accordingly, list this matter again on 18.08.2026. Mr. A.R. Tahbildar, learned Standing Counsel has assured that he would make endeavour to have instructions in the matter so that the matter can be taken up for disposal, on the next day fixed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant