Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/3182/2024 of ABDUL HAMID CHOWDHARY Vs KAYSOR AHMED AND 6 ORS on 28 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010138682024 2026:GAU-AS:10467 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No.: I.A.(Civil)/3182/2024 ABDUL HAMID CHOWDHARY S/O- LT. ROSMAN ALI VILL- DEKIRPAR P.O. P.S. BADARPUR DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN- 788806 VERSUS KAYSOR AHMED AND 6 ORS

GAHC010138682024

2026:GAU-AS:10467

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No.: I.A.(Civil)/3182/2024

ABDUL HAMID CHOWDHARY

S/O- LT. ROSMAN ALI

VILL- DEKIRPAR

P.O. P.S. BADARPUR

DIST. KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN- 788806

VERSUS

KAYSOR AHMED AND 6 ORS

S/O- LT. ABDUL MANNAN

VILL- DEORAL

P.O. AND P.S. BADARPUR

DIST. KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN- 788806

2:THE STATE OF ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY

GOVT. OF ASSAM

DISPUR

GHY-06

3:THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES

ASSAM

KHANAPARA

GHY-22

4:THE ZONAL JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES

SILCHAR

ZONE

SILCHAR

DIST. CACHAR

ASSAM

PIN- 7888001

5:THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES

KARIMGANJ

DIST. KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

6:THE EAST BADARPUR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES LTD.

REPRESENTED BY ONE MAN COMMITTEE

EAST BADARPUR

CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES

P.O. P.S. BADARPUR

DIST. KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN- 788806

7:THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF EAST BADARPUR CO-OPERATIVE

SOCIETIES LTD.

REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF EAST BADARPUR CO-OPERATIVE

SOCIETY

P.O. AND P.S. BADARPUR

DIST. KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN- 788806

For the Applicant(s) : Mr. B. Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. M. U. Mondal, Advocate

BEFORE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

29.07.2026 Mr. B. Sinha, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant submits that unfortunately the Applicant expired.

2. In view of the said submission, the instant application cannot be proceeded with for which the instant application stands closed as it has become infructuous.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead