Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/17/2020 of M/S MASTER (INDIA) BREWING COMPANY AND ANR Vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND 6 ORS on 28 July 2026
GAHC010320122019 2026:GAU-AS:10462 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/17/2020 M/S MASTER (INDIA) BREWING COMPANY AND ANR A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT EXPRESS COMPLEX, DR. B. BOROOAH ROAD, ULUBARI,
GAHC010320122019
2026:GAU-AS:10462
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/17/2020
M/S MASTER (INDIA) BREWING COMPANY AND ANR
A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT EXPRESS
COMPLEX, DR. B. BOROOAH ROAD, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI-781007, REP BY
ONE OF ITS PARTNER SHRI RAJESH JALAN
2: RAJESH KUMAR JALAN
S/O SHRI LAXMI NARAYAN JALAN
R/O HOUSE NO. 17 GAYATRI KUNJ
BYE LANE NO. 2
USHA NAGAR
CHITRALEKHA LANE
DISPUR
SUPER MARKET
GUWAHATI-78100
VERSUS
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND 6 ORS
A NATIONAL BANK HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT PLOT NO. 4, SECTOR 10 DWARKA NEW DELHI-110075, REP BY ITS MANAGING
DIRECTOR CUM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
2:PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
GUWAHATI CIRCLE
NILGIRI MANSION
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI-781005
REP. BY THE CIRCLE HEAD
3:THE CHIEF MANAGER
CENTRALIZED LOAN PROCESSING CENTRE
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
NILGIRI MANSION
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI-781005
4:THE CHIEF MANAGER
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
ZOO ROAD BRANCH
MANIK NAGAR
GUWAHATI-781006
5:THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (CREDIT)
STATE BANK OF INDIA
CENTRAL OFFICE
P.B. NO. 12
NARIMAN POINT
MUMBAI-400021
6:THE BRANCH MANAGER
ICD AMINGAON BRANCH
STATE BANK OF INDIA
GUWAHATI-781031
7:HDFC BANK
GUWAHATI BRANCH
G.S. ROAD
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI-78100
For the Petitioner(s) : None appears
For the Respondent(s) : XXXX
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
29.07.2026
None appears on behalf of the Petitioners on call.
2. It is seen that the Petitioners did not appear on the earlier occasion and have also not taken any steps, as would be evident from the order of the Lawazima Court. It, therefore, appears that the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present proceedings. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. The interim order passed earlier stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant