Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/524/2024 of GO-002092W RAM MILAN Vs GIRIDHAR ARAMANE AND 2 ORS. on 26 July 2026
GAHC010203722024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/524/2024 GO-002092W RAM MILAN S/O- LATE GHINAHOO YADAV, R/O- FLAT NO. A3/529, HIMSAGAR APARTMENTS, BUILDERS AREA, POCKET-IV, GREATER NOIDA, DIST. GAUTAM BUDDH
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010203722024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/524/2024
GO-002092W RAM MILAN
S/O- LATE GHINAHOO YADAV, R/O- FLAT NO. A3/529, HIMSAGAR
APARTMENTS, BUILDERS AREA, POCKET-IV, GREATER NOIDA, DIST.
GAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR, UTTAR PRADESH, PIN- 201310, PRESENTLY
SERVING AS SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (CIVIL) AND STATIONED AT
HQ ADDL. DGBR (NW), SECTOR 48-C, CHANDIGARH, PIN- 160047.
VERSUS
GIRIDHAR ARAMANE AND 2 ORS.
DEFENCE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, 101-A, SOUTH
BLOCK,NEW DELHI-110011.
2:MAYANK TEWARI
JOINT SECRETARY
BORDER ROADS DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BRDB)
(NOW RE-DESIGNATED AS JOINT SECRETARY MOD (BORDER ROADS)
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
198-B
SOUTH BLOCK
NEW DELHI-110011.
3:(LT GEN) RAGHU SRINIVASAN
DIRECTOR GENERAL
BORDER ROADS ORGANIZATION SEEMA SADAK BHAWAN RING ROAD
DELHI CANTT
NEW DELHI-110010
Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS. R BORAH, MR. D BORAH
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S S ROY (R-3), Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 27.07.2026 Heard Mr. D. Bora, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. S. Roy, learned counsel appearing for the respondent(s)/contemnor(s) on call. It is submitted by Mr. D. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioner that the order of this Court, which is being assailed to have not been complied with in the present contempt proceeding, is in the meantime duly complied with by the respondent authorities. He accordingly submits that the order of this Court dated 29.02.2024 having been complied with, nothing survives for adjudication in the present contempt proceedings. In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt petition stands closed. The notice issued to the alleged contemnor(s) stands discharged. JUDGE Comparing Assistant