Gauhati High Court

Cont.Cas(C)/353/2026 of AJOY BORUAH AND 4 ORS. Vs SUMIT SATTAWAN AND ANR on 26 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010120212026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/353/2026 AJOY BORUAH AND 4 ORS. S/O LATE BIRENDRA NATH BORUAH, RESIDENT OF J.P. NAGAR, DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, PIN-786001 2: SARANAN SONOWAL S/O LATE RAM PRASAD

GAHC010120212026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/353/2026

AJOY BORUAH AND 4 ORS.

S/O LATE BIRENDRA NATH BORUAH, RESIDENT OF J.P. NAGAR, DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, PIN-786001

2: SARANAN SONOWAL

S/O LATE RAM PRASAD SONOWAL

RESIDENT OF THANA GALI

CHIRINGCHAPARI

DIBRUGARH

ASSAM

PIN - 786001

3: ALFORID HUDA

S/O LATE NURUL HUDA

RESIDENT OF SOUTH AMOLAPATTY

DIBRUGARH

ASSAM

PIN-786008

4: NABIN DEORI

S/O LATE DAUDIDHAR DEORI

RESIDENT OF MANCOTTA ROAD

CHOWKIDINGHEE

DIBRUGARH

ASSAM

PIN- 786001

5: RENU LAHON

S/O LATE K.R. LAHON

RESIDENT OF BOIRAGIMOTH

DIBRUGARH

ASSAM

PIN- 78600

VERSUS

SUMIT SATTAWAN AND ANR

DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, TINSUKIA, BORGURI, TINSUKIA, ASSAM- 786126

2:SMT. LINA PAWE

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER (REVENUE)

TINSUKIA

O/O DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

TINSUKIA

BORGURI

TINSUKIA

ASSAM- 78612

Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. S R A NASER, MR G ALAM

Advocate for the Respondent : ,

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 27.07.2026

Mr. A. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioners who has appeared through virtual mode with Mr. P. Sharma, learned counsel has submitted that since, the direction made in the Order dated 10.03.2026 in the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 4582/2025, alleging non-compliance of which the contempt petition was filed, has since been complied with, the petitioners do not want to proceed with the contempt petition. Mr. P.K. Medhi, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 2 & 3 is present. In view of the above submission made on behalf of the petitioners that the direction in the Order dated 10.03.2026 has been complied with, the contempt petition is closed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead