Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/386/2026 of M/S UTPALA TRADERS Vs KAILASH KARTHIK N AND 3 ORS. on 23 July 2026
GAHC010149462026 2026:GAU-AS:10205 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/386/2026 M/S UTPALA TRADERS REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI BIJU SINHA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, SON OF LATE BIREN SINHA, RESIDENT OF DHARAMNALA, P.S.-
GAHC010149462026
2026:GAU-AS:10205
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/386/2026
M/S UTPALA TRADERS
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI BIJU SINHA, AGED ABOUT 62
YEARS, SON OF LATE BIREN SINHA, RESIDENT OF DHARAMNALA, P.S.- DIPHU, DISTRICT- KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM, PIN- 782460
VERSUS
KAILASH KARTHIK N AND 3 ORS.
THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, JANATA BHAWAN, 2ND
FLOOR, BLOCK-B, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM, PIN- 781006.
2:DILIP TERANG
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY-CUM-SECRETARY
KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL
DIPHU
KARBI ANGLONG
ASSAM- 782460.
3:MORNING KEEY PHANGCHO
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
DIPHU RURAL W/S DIVISION
DIPHU
KARBI ANGLONG- 782460.
4:BIKRAM TERON
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
DIPHU RURAL W/S DIVISION
DIPHU
KARBI ANGLONG- 78246
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.K. Baruah, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : None appears BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 24.07.2026
Mr. A.K. Baruah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that taking into account that the period of six weeks mentioned in the order dated 13.06.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 982/2023 is not over from the date of submission of the certified copy of the said order, which was submitted only on 04.07.2026, the petitioner would not like to press the instant contempt application. The learned counsel, however, submitted that in the circumstance, the order dated 13.06.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 982/2023 is not complied with, the petitioner may be granted liberty to approach this Court again.
2. Taking into account the above, the instant contempt application stands dropped on withdrawal.
3. Before parting with the record, this Court, however, observes that in the circumstance, after a lapse of six weeks if the order dated 13.06.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 982/2023
remains uncomplied with, the petitioner would be at liberty to again approach this Court.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant