Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/2959/2026 of SMT JAYA MAHANTA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. on 23 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010112852026 2026:GAU-AS:10212 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2959/2026 SMT JAYA MAHANTA WIFE OF SRI GAUTAM MAHANTA, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 20, RAJGARH ROAD, BYE LANE NO. 1, CHANDMARI, SILPUKHURI, GUWAHATI-781003,

GAHC010112852026

2026:GAU-AS:10212

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/2959/2026

SMT JAYA MAHANTA

WIFE OF SRI GAUTAM MAHANTA, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 20, RAJGARH

ROAD, BYE LANE NO. 1, CHANDMARI, SILPUKHURI, GUWAHATI-781003, DISTRICT KAMRUP METROPOLITAN, ASSAM.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE

GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, GUWAHATI DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006, ASSAM

2:THE GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER AND HAVING ITS OFFICE AT

GANESH MANDIR

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-781006

KAMRUP M

ASSAM

3:THE COMMISSIONER

GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

GANESH MANDIR

DISPUR

GUWAHATI- 781006

KAMRUP (M)

ASSAM.

4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

DISPUR ZONE

GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

DISPUR

GUWAHATI781006

KAMRUP (M)

ASSAM.

5:THE ASSOCIATE PLANNER

PLANNING BRANCH

GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

UZANBAZAR

GUWAHATI-781001

DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M)

ASSAM.

6:THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL

GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

DISPUR ZONE

GUWAHATI-781006

DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M)

ASSAM.

7:BLINK COMMERCE PVT LTD

REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

AND HAVING ITS OFFICE AT GROUND FLOOR

PIONEER SQUARE

SECTOR 62

GOLF COURSE EXTENSION ROAD

GURUGRAM-122098

HARYANA

Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. KP Pathak Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. S Bora Standing Counsel, GMC

B E F O R E

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

24.07.2026

Heard Mr. KP Pathak, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S Bora, the learned Standing Counsel, GMC.

2. Mr. S Bora, the learned Standing Counsel, GMC submits that pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 04.06.2026, the petitioner’s premises has been de-sealed. He further submitted upon instructions that if any further action is required to be taken, the same would be taken by following the provisions of Section 404(3) of the Gauhati Municipal Corporation Act, 1969.

3. Taking into account the above, nothing further remains to be adjudicated upon in the instant writ petition, for which, the writ petition stands closed.

4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead