Gauhati High Court

Crl.A./114/2026 of ANIL BHARALI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 22 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010060362026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.A./114/2026 ANIL BHARALI SON OF LATE PADMANATH BHARALI, RESIDENT OF VILL- DAHATI, P.S. BARPETA, DISTRICT BARPETA, ASSAM - 781314. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010060362026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Crl.A./114/2026

ANIL BHARALI

SON OF LATE PADMANATH BHARALI, RESIDENT OF VILL- DAHATI, P.S.

BARPETA, DISTRICT BARPETA, ASSAM - 781314.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM.

2:MRIGANKAR DAS

SON OF GAUTAM DAS

RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MATUAKUCHI

UNDER BARPETA POLICE STATION

IN THE DISTRICT OF BARPETA

ASSAM -78131

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A ATREYA, MS. C KALITA,MR D K BHATTACHARYYA,MS.

C KALITA,MR. J KONWAR

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 23/07/2026 (Michael Zothankhuma, J)

Page No.# 2/2

1. Mr. A. Atreya, learned counsel for the appellant submits that there was some misunderstanding in filing of 2 appeals by the appellant, against the same impugned judgement, by which he was convicted under Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He submits that due to a misunderstanding, 2 (two) appeals i.e. Criminal Appeal No. 114/2026 and Criminal Appeal No. 121/2026, have been filed against the same impugned judgement by the appellant. He accordingly prays that the appellant may be allowed to withdraw Criminal Appeal No. 114/2026.

2. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned APP, Assam, submits that he has got no objection to the same.

3. Accordingly, Criminal Appeal No. 114/2026 is dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead