Gauhati High Court
AB/875/2026 of TAKDIR ALI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 22 July 2026
GAHC010081552026 2026:GAU-AS:10144 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/875/2026 TAKDIR ALI S/O LATE INTAZ ALI VILL- DUWARARA P.S. DALGAON DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PP, ASSAM Advocate
GAHC010081552026
2026:GAU-AS:10144
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/875/2026
TAKDIR ALI
S/O LATE INTAZ ALI
VILL- DUWARARA
P.S. DALGAON
DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M H AHMED, MS. N SULTANA,I AMIN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR S ISLAM(INFORMANT),MR. J
UDDIN(INFORMANT),MR. M ALI(INFORMANT)
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
23.07.2026 Heard Mr. M.H Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K.K. Baishya, learned Addl. PP for the State and Mr. S. Islam, learned counsel for the informant. Although the Case Diary has been called for, the learned Addl. PP submits that the notes are available till 09.07.2026. On 22.07.2026, the learned I.O has requested the learned Addl. PP to submit his objections, since further investigation is required on the ground that sufficient material has been collected against the petitioner during investigation. Mr. S. Islam, learned counsel for the informant has submitted that after being granted the interim protection, the petitioner has been issuing threats to the informant and has also been intermittently hiding in the house of the informant with sharp weapons. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, has denied such allegations. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also perused the Case Diary. The other six accused in the present case have been granted absolute bail by the orders passed in AB No. 885/2026, AB No. 846/2026 and AB No. 844/2026. In view of the nature of the allegations made in the F.I.R and also keeping in view that other co-accused have been granted the privilege of pre-arrest bail, I am of the considered opinion that since the statement of the present petitioner has been recorded and looking at his advanced age and the assurance projected that he would be available for the purposes of investigation, the interim bail granted on 26.02.2026 is hereby with absolute. It is made clear that in the event the investigating officer finds that the petitioner has misused his bail in any manner whatsoever, the State would be at liberty to bring the said to the notice of the Court and pray for cancellation of the bail. JUDGE Comparing Assistant