Gauhati High Court
AB/1258/2026 of KANCHAN KUMARI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 21 July 2026
GAHC010115022026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1258/2026 KANCHAN KUMARI W/O AMIT KUMAR RAI, TEMPORARY R/O NARIKALBARI, SUB BYLANE 4, H NO 1, PO AND PS GEETANAGAR, DIST KAMRUP M, ASSAM, PERMANENT R/O DHIRAJ NAGAR, PO
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010115022026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1258/2026
KANCHAN KUMARI
W/O AMIT KUMAR RAI, TEMPORARY R/O NARIKALBARI, SUB BYLANE 4, H NO 1, PO AND PS GEETANAGAR, DIST KAMRUP M, ASSAM, PERMANENT
R/O DHIRAJ NAGAR, PO ARMANNAGAR, PS FARIDABAD, DIST
FARIDABAD, STATE HARYANA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D MEDHI, MR. R SHARMA,MR. S K GOSWAMI,S
YESMIN,MR P SONOWAL
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR. C MAHANTA(INFORMANT),MR. N
BARMAN(INFORMANT)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 22.07.2026
Heard Mr. D. Medhi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Mr. N. Barman, Page No.# 2/2 learned counsel for the informant.
2. This is an application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 praying for the grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, namely, Kanchan Kumari, in connection with Dispur P.S. Case No. 345/2026 registered under Section 316(2)/318(4)/336(3)/61(2) of BNS, 2023.
3. The petitioner was granted interim bail on 23-06-2016. The petitioner is stated to be the wife of Amit Kumar. It is submitted that in the meantime, the parties have settled the matter and an agreement was also filed. In the context of the same, two FIR names accused were granted regular bail by this Court.
4. The learned counsel for the informant does not object to grant of bail and supported the contention regarding the settlement between the parties.
5. In the circumstances, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 23.06.2026 hereby made absolute subject to the condition that she shall co-operate with the process of law.
6. The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
7. Send back the case diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant