Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/8047/2022 of MD SOHRAB ALI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 21 July 2026
GAHC010253772022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/8047/2022 MD SOHRAB ALI S/O LATE JOSIM UDDIN, R/O VILL- LAOGAON, P.O.-SOLMARI, MOUZA- KASAMARI, P.S.-NAGAON SADAR, DIST- NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782002 VERSUS THE STATE OF
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010253772022
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/8047/2022
MD SOHRAB ALI
S/O LATE JOSIM UDDIN, R/O VILL- LAOGAON, P.O.-SOLMARI, MOUZA- KASAMARI, P.S.-NAGAON SADAR, DIST- NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782002
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, EDUCATION (ELEMENTARY), DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6
2:DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI-19
3:DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
NAGAON
ASSAM
4:BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
KHAGARIJAN EDUCATIONAL BLOCK
NAGAON
ASSAM
5:THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (EDUCATION)
DISTRICT- NAGAON
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. P BHATTACHARYA, MR B S DEKA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, MRS. D DAS BARMAN, GA, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 22.07.2026 Heard Ms. P. Bhattacharya, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. N. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Elementary Education Department (respondent Nos. 1 to 4). Ms. P. Bhattacharya, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that since the petitioner has already got the relief sought in the present writ petition, she has been instructed by writ petitioner not to press the instant writ petition and accordingly, makes an endorsement before this Court. In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on being withdrawn. JUDGE Comparing Assistant