Gauhati High Court
AB/782/2026 of JAHIRUL ISLAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 20 July 2026
GAHC010072482026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/782/2026 JAHIRUL ISLAM S/O WAHIDUL ISLAM R/O VILL- PACHIM MAIRABARI, P.S. MOIRABARI, DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010072482026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/782/2026
JAHIRUL ISLAM
S/O WAHIDUL ISLAM
R/O VILL- PACHIM MAIRABARI, P.S. MOIRABARI, DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A AHMED, U U KHAN,MR A AHMED,MR. M A
CHOUDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 21.07.2026
Heard Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This subsequent bail petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, whereby the petitioner, namely, Jahirul Islam, has prayed for granting pre-arrest bail, apprehending arrest in Page No.# 2/2 connection with Jagiroad P.S. Case No. 267/2025 under Section 318(4)/316(3)/314 of BNS, 2023.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner reiterates his contention that the petitioner herein is a professional driver who might have driving the said JCB on hire upon payment of Rs.2,000/- and further submits in this regard that he is not involved in commission of any offence with regard to the said JCB.
4. On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that investigation has found some incriminating materials against the petitioner. However, he has fairly submitted that pursuant to grant of interim bail, the petitioner has appeared before the I/O, whereupon he was examined again.
5. In the given facts and circumstance, despite the implications projected by the prosecution, I do not deem it fit to cancel the interim bail granted to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the interim protection vide dated 26.05.2026 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions – that the petitioner shall co-operate with remaining investigation as and when required; that the petitioner shall not commit any illegal activities or offences; and that the petitioner shall not hamper or tamper with evidence.
7. Violation or breach of condition(s) shall entail cancellation of the bail.
8. The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
9. Send back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant