Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/9538/2019 of ABDUL SALAM Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. on 19 July 2026
GAHC010312112019 2026:GAU-AS:9916 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/9538/2019 ABDUL SALAM S/O AHMED ALI, R/O DOOMDOOMA TOWN, P.S.-DOOMDOOMA, DIST- TINSUKIA, ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO
GAHC010312112019
2026:GAU-AS:9916
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/9538/2019
ABDUL SALAM
S/O AHMED ALI, R/O DOOMDOOMA TOWN, P.S.-DOOMDOOMA, DIST- TINSUKIA, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.
THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, THE
MINISTRY OF POLITICAL AND HOME AFFAIRS, GRIHA MANTRALAYA, NEW DELHI
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
HOME DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
3:TH ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA
NIRVACHAN SADAN
ASHOKA ROAD
NEW DELHI-110001
4:THE STATE CO-ORDINATOR
NATIONAL REGISTRATION OF CITIZEN
ASSAM
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI-781005
5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
TINSUKIA
P.O.-TINSUKIA
DIST-TINSUKIA
ASSAM
PIN-786172
6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (BORDER)
TINSUKIA
P.O.-TINSUKIA
DIST-TINSUKIA
ASSAM
PIN-78619
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. L R MAZUMDER, MD. I HUSSAIN,MR. F A HASSAN
Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., SC, NRC,SC, F.T,SC, ECI
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 20-07-2026 (K.R.Surana,J)
Heard Mr. I. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. I. Borthakur, learned CGC; Mr. A. J. Ali, learned Standing counsel, ECI and Ms. A. Verma, learned Standing counsel, FT and Border matters.
2. By filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner namely, Abdul Salam, has assailed the ex-parte opinion dated 28.05.2012, passed by the learned Member, Foreigners Tribunal, Dibrugarh/Tinsukia in F.T. Case No. 97/D/06 corresponding to P.E. No. 280/06, by which he was declared to be a foreigner of post 1971 steam.
3. The learned Standing counsel for the FT and Border matters has opposed the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground of inordinate delay and laches in assailing the said opinion.
4. On a perusal of the Tribunal records, it is seen that the notice was stated to have been served in a substituted manner. However, on a perusal of the process server’s report, due compliance with the provision of Order 3 (5) (f) of the Foreigners (Tribunal) Order, 1964 is not found. The said provision requires notice to be affixed at the outer door or some other conspicuous part of the house in which the proceedee ordinarily resides or last resided. Therefore, the delay in preferring the impugned opinion would not be fatal. Accordingly, the Court is inclined to set aside the impugned ex-parte opinion dated 28.05.2012.
5. The matter is remanded back to the said learned Tribunal for a fresh decision. The petitioner, who is duly represented by his learned counsel shall enter appearance before the said learned Tribunal within the outer limit of 24.08.2026. It is made clear that if the petitioner does not enter appearance within the time allowed, it would be open to the said learned Tribunal to treat the petitioner as absent in the proceeding and proceed with the matter in accordance with law.
6. The learned counsel shall produce a certified copy of this order as well as file his written statement of defence and file documents in support of his defence. The learned Tribunal shall thereafter make an endeavour to dispose of the reference in the time prescribed under Order 3 (14) of the Foreigners (Tribunals) Order, 1964.
7. The Registry shall send back the records expeditiously.
8. Writ petition stands allowed to the extent as indicated above.
9. There shall be no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant