Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3567/2024 of G KUMAR Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS on 19 July 2026
GAHC010140922024 2026:GAU-AS:9871 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3567/2024 G KUMAR SON OF LATE P.G. GANGADHARAN, COMMANDANT (UNDER SUSPENSION) IRLA NO. 4460, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR
GAHC010140922024
2026:GAU-AS:9871
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3567/2024
G KUMAR
SON OF LATE P.G. GANGADHARAN,
COMMANDANT (UNDER SUSPENSION)
IRLA NO. 4460,
CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE,
OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, NORTH EAST ZONE, 9TH MILE CAMP, POST OFFICE AMERIGOG, POLICE OUTPOST- JORABAT UNDER BASISTHA POLICE STATION, GUWAHATI- 781023, DISTRICT- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI- 110001.
2:THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL
CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE
BLOCK NO. 1
CGO COMPLEX
LODHI ROAD
NEW DELHI- 110003.
3:THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL
CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE
NORTH EAST ZONE
9TH MILE
AMERIGOG
KAMRUP METRO
GUWAHATI- 781023
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A AHMED, MS. D GOSWAMI
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR M R ADHIKARI
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 20.07.2026 Heard Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard M. R. Adhikari, learned CGC appearing for the respondents. By way of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the impugned suspension order dated 03.11.2023 and the subsequent orders extending the period of suspension. During the pendency of the present writ petition, the Directorate General, CRPF, Ministry of Home Affairs, by order dated 28.03.2025, upon review and on the recommendation of the Suspension Review Committee, revoked the suspension of the petitioner with immediate effect. It has been mentioned in the aforesaid order that the period of suspension with effect from 03.11.2023 till the date of revocation shall be regularized in accordance with the applicable rules after finalization of the departmental enquiry.
The order dated 28.03.2025 reads as under: “No. Dix-29/2073-CRC
DIRECTORATE GENERAL: CRPF
(Ministry of Home Affairs)
Block No. 1, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi- 03 Dated, the 28/3/2025
ORDER
WHEREAS, an order placing Shri G. Kumar, Commandant (IRLA-4460), NE Zone HOS, CRPI, under suspension was made vide P/Order dated 03- 11-2023.
2. AND WHEREAS, the suspension period was subsequently reviewed and the Competent Authority, considering the recommendation of Suspension Review Committee, extended the suspension period for another 180 days w.e.f 26-01-2025 vide P/Order dated 20-01-2025.
3. AND WHEREAS, the suspension order was subsequently reviewed by the Suspension Review Committee on 06-03-2075 and the President, considering the recommendation of the Suspension Review Committee and in exercise of the powers conferred under Clause (c) of sub-rule (5) of Rule 10 of CCS(CA) Rules, 1965 approved to revoke the said suspension order with immediate effect.
4. NOW, THEREFORE, the said order of suspension in respect of Shri G. Kumar, Commandant (IRLA-4460) is hereby revoked with immediate effect. The period of suspension w.e.f 03-11-2073 till the date of revocation will be regularized as per rules, after finalization of DI..
(By the Order and in the name of President)”
The copy of the said order has been furnished before this Court by M. R. Adhikari, learned CGC for the respondents, is kept on record. Upon hearing the parties appearing for the parties and having perused the impugned revocation order of the suspension which being the subject matter of challenge in the present writ petition, it appears that nothing survives for adjudication in the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as per the consensus arrived at between the learned counsels for the parties.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant